Karly Lao
2025-09-03T13:50:50+02:00
Microsoft® Word for Microsoft 365
2025-09-03T13:50:50+02:00
Microsoft® Word for Microsoft 365
Microsoft® Word for Microsoft 365
Karly Lao
Microsoft® Word for Microsoft 3652025-09-03T13:50:50+02:002025-09-03T13:50:50+02:00
uuid:98240D9C-444C-4A87-A060-F888B02E45D5uuid:98240D9C-444C-4A87-A060-F888B02E45D5
engines={image=false textcolor=true vector=false text=true} tetml={filename={D:\Drim\repository\projects\drim_66_0\metadata\f\6\f6cacb801574320f348b9335624b5512\f6cacb801574320f348b9335624b5512.para.xml} elements={annotations=false bookmarks=false destinations=false fields=false javascripts=false} }
granularity=word tetml={elements={line} glyphdetails={all}} contentanalysis={punctuationbreaks=false dehyphenate=false shadowdetect=false} layoutanalysis={tabledetect=0 layoutdetect=3} structureanalysis={list=true}
PROJECT
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
ALPINE
A
L
P
I
N
E
Basis
B
a
s
i
s
of
o
f
Design
D
e
s
i
g
n
granularity=word tetml={elements={line} glyphdetails={all}} contentanalysis={punctuationbreaks=false dehyphenate=false shadowdetect=false} layoutanalysis={tabledetect=0 layoutdetect=3} structureanalysis={list=true}
1
1
EXECUTIVE
E
X
E
C
U
T
I
V
E
SUMMARY
S
U
M
M
A
R
Y
This
T
h
i
s
document
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
establishes
e
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
s
the
t
h
e
preliminary
p
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
Basis
B
a
s
i
s
of
o
f
Design
D
e
s
i
g
n
for
f
o
r
the
t
h
e
offshore
o
ff
s
h
o
r
e
production
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
facilities
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
and
a
n
d
associated
a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
subsea
s
u
b
s
e
a
systems
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
forming
f
o
r
m
i
n
g
part
p
a
r
t
of
o
f
PROJECT
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
ALPINE,
A
L
P
I
N
E
,
located
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
within
w
i
t
h
i
n
the
t
h
e
Horizon
H
o
r
i
z
o
n
South
S
o
u
t
h
offshore
o
ff
s
h
o
r
e
exploration
e
x
p
l
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
block
b
l
o
c
k
in
i
n
the
t
h
e
Pelagia
P
e
l
a
g
i
a
Basin.
B
a
s
i
n
.
The
T
h
e
scope
s
c
o
p
e
addresses
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
e
s
both
b
o
t
h
topside
t
o
p
s
i
d
e
and
a
n
d
subsea
s
u
b
s
e
a
infrastructure
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
intended
i
n
t
e
n
d
e
d
to
t
o
support
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
the
t
h
e
commercial
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
development
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
of
o
f
the
t
h
e
field,
fi
e
l
d
,
including
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
provisions
p
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
for
f
o
r
integration
i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
with
w
i
t
h
the
t
h
e
Central
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
Nexus
N
e
x
u
s
Facility.
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
.
The
T
h
e
content
c
o
n
t
e
n
t
herein
h
e
r
e
i
n
consolidates
c
o
n
s
o
l
i
d
a
t
e
s
the
t
h
e
current
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
understanding
u
n
d
e
r
s
t
a
n
d
i
n
g
of
o
f
the
t
h
e
Aurora-1
A
u
r
o
r
a
-
1
and
a
n
d
Epsilon-4
E
p
s
i
l
o
n
-
4
wells,
w
e
l
l
s
,
encompassing
e
n
c
o
m
p
a
s
s
i
n
g
reservoir
r
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
performance
p
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
characteristics,
c
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
s
t
i
c
s
,
produced
p
r
o
d
u
c
e
d
fluid
fl
u
i
d
properties,
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
,
and
a
n
d
indicative
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
i
v
e
well
w
e
l
l
productivity
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
profiles.
p
r
o
fi
l
e
s
.
It
I
t
also
a
l
s
o
incorporates
i
n
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
s
the
t
h
e
latest
l
a
t
e
s
t
available
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
geomorphological
g
e
o
m
o
r
p
h
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
surveys
s
u
r
v
e
y
s
and
a
n
d
metocean
m
e
t
o
c
e
a
n
design
d
e
s
i
g
n
parameters
p
a
r
a
m
e
t
e
r
s
relevant
r
e
l
e
v
a
n
t
to
t
o
installation
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
and
a
n
d
operational
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
considerations
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
in
i
n
the
t
h
e
northeastern
n
o
r
t
h
e
a
s
t
e
r
n
seaboard
s
e
a
b
o
a
r
d
waters
w
a
t
e
r
s
of
o
f
Valmora
V
a
l
m
o
r
a
Island.
I
s
l
a
n
d
.
An
A
n
initial
i
n
i
t
i
a
l
conceptual
c
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
arrangement
a
r
r
a
n
g
e
m
e
n
t
of
o
f
the
t
h
e
field
fi
e
l
d
development
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
system
s
y
s
t
e
m
is
i
s
provided,
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
,
outlining
o
u
t
l
i
n
i
n
g
potential
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
subsea
s
u
b
s
e
a
architecture,
a
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
e
,
tie-back
t
i
e
-
b
a
c
k
routes,
r
o
u
t
e
s
,
and
a
n
d
processing
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
i
n
g
options.
o
p
t
i
o
n
s
.
This
T
h
i
s
arrangement
a
r
r
a
n
g
e
m
e
n
t
is
i
s
intended
i
n
t
e
n
d
e
d
as
a
s
a
a
baseline
b
a
s
e
l
i
n
e
reference
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
for
f
o
r
PRIME
P
R
I
M
E
ENERGY
E
N
E
R
G
Y
and
a
n
d
its
i
t
s
project
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
partners—Stratos
p
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
—
S
t
r
a
t
o
s
Energy
E
n
e
r
g
y
Ltd.
L
t
d
.
(Operator,
(
O
p
e
r
a
t
o
r
,
40%
4
0
%
interest),
i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
)
,
Novara
N
o
v
a
r
a
Petrochem
P
e
t
r
o
c
h
e
m
(30%),
(
3
0
%
)
,
and
a
n
d
Helix
H
e
l
i
x
GeoVentures
G
e
o
V
e
n
t
u
r
e
s
(30%)—to
(
3
0
%
)
—
t
o
support
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
further
f
u
r
t
h
e
r
engineering
e
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
definition
d
e
fi
n
i
t
i
o
n
by
b
y
prequalified
p
r
e
q
u
a
l
i
fi
e
d
tenderers.
t
e
n
d
e
r
e
r
s
.
The
T
h
e
document
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
will
w
i
l
l
be
b
e
progressively
p
r
o
g
r
e
s
s
i
v
e
l
y
refined
r
e
fi
n
e
d
as
a
s
PROJECT
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
ALPINE
A
L
P
I
N
E
advances
a
d
v
a
n
c
e
s
through
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
its
i
t
s
development
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
phases.
p
h
a
s
e
s
.
Updates
U
p
d
a
t
e
s
are
a
r
e
anticipated
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
at
a
t
key
k
e
y
decision
d
e
c
i
s
i
o
n
gates,
g
a
t
e
s
,
including
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
prior
p
r
i
o
r
to
t
o
Front-End
F
r
o
n
t
-
E
n
d
Engineering
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
Design
D
e
s
i
g
n
(FEED)
(
F
E
E
D
)
commencement,
c
o
m
m
e
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
,
and
a
n
d
following
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
the
t
h
e
incorporation
i
n
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
of
o
f
new
n
e
w
data
d
a
t
a
from
f
r
o
m
drilling
d
r
i
l
l
i
n
g
campaigns
c
a
m
p
a
i
g
n
s
undertaken
u
n
d
e
r
t
a
k
e
n
by
b
y
TerraNova
T
e
r
r
a
N
o
v
a
Drilling
D
r
i
l
l
i
n
g
Co.
C
o
.
and
a
n
d
other
o
t
h
e
r
service
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
providers.
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
r
s
.
2
2
INTRODUCTION
I
N
T
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
The
T
h
e
hydrocarbon
h
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
resource
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
under
u
n
d
e
r
consideration
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
is
i
s
situated
s
i
t
u
a
t
e
d
within
w
i
t
h
i
n
the
t
h
e
Horizon
H
o
r
i
z
o
n
South
S
o
u
t
h
offshore
o
ff
s
h
o
r
e
exploration
e
x
p
l
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
block,
b
l
o
c
k
,
part
p
a
r
t
of
o
f
the
t
h
e
greater
g
r
e
a
t
e
r
Pelagia
P
e
l
a
g
i
a
Basin
B
a
s
i
n
along
a
l
o
n
g
the
t
h
e
northeastern
n
o
r
t
h
e
a
s
t
e
r
n
maritime
m
a
r
i
t
i
m
e
boundary
b
o
u
n
d
a
r
y
of
o
f
Valmora
V
a
l
m
o
r
a
Island.
I
s
l
a
n
d
.
Horizon
H
o
r
i
z
o
n
South
S
o
u
t
h
is
i
s
currently
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
under
u
n
d
e
r
the
t
h
e
operatorship
o
p
e
r
a
t
o
r
s
h
i
p
of
o
f
Stratos
S
t
r
a
t
o
s
Energy
E
n
e
r
g
y
Ltd.
L
t
d
.
(40%
(
4
0
%
participating
p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
i
n
g
interest),
i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
)
,
in
i
n
partnership
p
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
with
w
i
t
h
Novara
N
o
v
a
r
a
Petrochem
P
e
t
r
o
c
h
e
m
(30%)
(
3
0
%
)
and
a
n
d
Helix
H
e
l
i
x
GeoVentures
G
e
o
V
e
n
t
u
r
e
s
(30%).
(
3
0
%
)
.
The
T
h
e
concession
c
o
n
c
e
s
s
i
o
n
was
w
a
s
secured
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
under
u
n
d
e
r
a
a
revised
r
e
v
i
s
e
d
production-sharing
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
-
s
h
a
r
i
n
g
arrangement
a
r
r
a
n
g
e
m
e
n
t
tailored
t
a
i
l
o
r
e
d
to
t
o
distribute
d
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
investment
i
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
risk
r
i
s
k
among
a
m
o
n
g
stakeholders,
s
t
a
k
e
h
o
l
d
e
r
s
,
with
w
i
t
h
contractual
c
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
u
a
l
rights
r
i
g
h
t
s
awarded
a
w
a
r
d
e
d
in
i
n
August
A
u
g
u
s
t
2019
2
0
1
9
and
a
n
d
commercial
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
terms
t
e
r
m
s
becoming
b
e
c
o
m
i
n
g
effective
e
ff
e
c
t
i
v
e
in
i
n
January
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
2020.
2
0
2
0
.
The
T
h
e
first
fi
r
s
t
exploratory
e
x
p
l
o
r
a
t
o
r
y
campaign
c
a
m
p
a
i
g
n
in
i
n
the
t
h
e
block
b
l
o
c
k
was
w
a
s
executed
e
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
through
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
the
t
h
e
drilling
d
r
i
l
l
i
n
g
of
o
f
the
t
h
e
Aurora-
A
u
r
o
r
a
-
1
1
well,
w
e
l
l
,
undertaken
u
n
d
e
r
t
a
k
e
n
by
b
y
TerraNova
T
e
r
r
a
N
o
v
a
Drilling
D
r
i
l
l
i
n
g
Co.
C
o
.
The
T
h
e
well
w
e
l
l
was
w
a
s
spudded
s
p
u
d
d
e
d
on
o
n
21
2
1
May
M
a
y
2002
2
0
0
2
in
i
n
granularity=word tetml={elements={line} glyphdetails={all}} contentanalysis={punctuationbreaks=false dehyphenate=false shadowdetect=false} layoutanalysis={tabledetect=0 layoutdetect=3} structureanalysis={list=true}
water
w
a
t
e
r
depths
d
e
p
t
h
s
of
o
f
approximately
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
2,436
2
,
4
3
6
feet,
f
e
e
t
,
reaching
r
e
a
c
h
i
n
g
a
a
total
t
o
t
a
l
measured
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
d
depth
d
e
p
t
h
of
o
f
13,441
1
3
,
4
4
1
feet
f
e
e
t
(true
(
t
r
u
e
vertical
v
e
r
t
i
c
a
l
depth
d
e
p
t
h
of
o
f
13,100
1
3
,
1
0
0
feet).
f
e
e
t
)
.
Drilling
D
r
i
l
l
i
n
g
operations
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
concluded
c
o
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
on
o
n
7
7
June
J
u
n
e
2002.
2
0
0
2
.
Historical
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l
exploration
e
x
p
l
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
in
i
n
the
t
h
e
vicinity
v
i
c
i
n
i
t
y
had
h
a
d
already
a
l
r
e
a
d
y
indicated
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
hydrocarbon
h
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
potential,
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
,
most
m
o
s
t
notably
n
o
t
a
b
l
y
through
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
the
t
h
e
Epsilon-4
E
p
s
i
l
o
n
-
4
well
w
e
l
l
drilled
d
r
i
l
l
e
d
in
i
n
2001
2
0
0
1
by
b
y
former
f
o
r
m
e
r
license
l
i
c
e
n
s
e
holder
h
o
l
d
e
r
BlueArc
B
l
u
e
A
r
c
Resources.
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
.
Both
B
o
t
h
Aurora-1
A
u
r
o
r
a
-
1
and
a
n
d
Epsilon-4
E
p
s
i
l
o
n
-
4
are
a
r
e
positioned
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
e
d
along
a
l
o
n
g
the
t
h
e
southwestern
s
o
u
t
h
w
e
s
t
e
r
n
flank
fl
a
n
k
of
o
f
the
t
h
e
principal
p
r
i
n
c
i
p
a
l
structural
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
high,
h
i
g
h
,
separated
s
e
p
a
r
a
t
e
d
by
b
y
a
a
subsurface
s
u
b
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
saddle
s
a
d
d
l
e
feature
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
that
t
h
a
t
influences
i
n
fl
u
e
n
c
e
s
reservoir
r
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
connectivity
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
and
a
n
d
development
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
planning.
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
.
2.1
2
.
1
Field
F
i
e
l
d
Development
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Strategy
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
The
T
h
e
preferred
p
r
e
f
e
r
r
e
d
development
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
concept
c
o
n
c
e
p
t
foresees
f
o
r
e
s
e
e
s
a
a
subsea
s
u
b
s
e
a
tie-back
t
i
e
-
b
a
c
k
to
t
o
existing
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
offshore
o
ff
s
h
o
r
e
facilities,
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
,
leveraging
l
e
v
e
r
a
g
i
n
g
underutilized
u
n
d
e
r
u
t
i
l
i
z
e
d
processing
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
i
n
g
and
a
n
d
export
e
x
p
o
r
t
infrastructure
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
approaching
a
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
i
n
g
late-
l
a
t
e
-
life
l
i
f
e
production.
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
.
This
T
h
i
s
approach
a
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
provides
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
a
cost-efficient
c
o
s
t
-
e
ff
i
c
i
e
n
t
route
r
o
u
t
e
to
t
o
commercialization
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
while
w
h
i
l
e
mitigating
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
n
g
the
t
h
e
environmental
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
footprint
f
o
o
t
p
r
i
n
t
of
o
f
new
n
e
w
installations.
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
The
T
h
e
planned
p
l
a
n
n
e
d
connection
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
point
p
o
i
n
t
is
i
s
strategically
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
a
l
l
y
located
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
in
i
n
proximity
p
r
o
x
i
m
i
t
y
to
t
o
the
t
h
e
Central
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
Nexus
N
e
x
u
s
Facility,
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
,
thereby
t
h
e
r
e
b
y
reducing
r
e
d
u
c
i
n
g
the
t
h
e
extent
e
x
t
e
n
t
of
o
f
modifications
m
o
d
i
fi
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
required
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
and
a
n
d
facilitating
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
a
t
i
n
g
smooth
s
m
o
o
t
h
integration
i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
into
i
n
t
o
the
t
h
e
established
e
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
production
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
network.
n
e
t
w
o
r
k
.
3
3
LOCAL
L
O
C
A
L
ACTS,
A
C
T
S
,
LAWS,
L
A
W
S
,
RULES,
R
U
L
E
S
,
AND
A
N
D
REGULATIONS
R
E
G
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
S
3.1
3
.
1
Environmental
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
Emission
E
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
Limits
L
i
m
i
t
s
Refer
R
e
f
e
r
to
t
o
[7].
[
7
]
.
Any
A
n
y
project
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
activities
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
within
w
i
t
h
i
n
PROJECT
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
ALPINE
A
L
P
I
N
E
that
t
h
a
t
could
c
o
u
l
d
potentially
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
l
y
affect
a
ff
e
c
t
the
t
h
e
surrounding
s
u
r
r
o
u
n
d
i
n
g
environment—such
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
—
s
u
c
h
as
a
s
pre-commissioning
p
r
e
-
c
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
i
n
g
or
o
r
hydrotesting
h
y
d
r
o
t
e
s
t
i
n
g
of
o
f
subsea
s
u
b
s
e
a
flowlines—shall
fl
o
w
l
i
n
e
s
—
s
h
a
l
l
undergo
u
n
d
e
r
g
o
a
a
detailed
d
e
t
a
i
l
e
d
assessment
a
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
in
i
n
coordination
c
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
with
w
i
t
h
the
t
h
e
project’s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
’
s
HSE
H
S
E
(Health,
(
H
e
a
l
t
h
,
Safety
S
a
f
e
t
y
&
&
Environment)
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
)
team.
t
e
a
m
.
This
T
h
i
s
ensures
e
n
s
u
r
e
s
that
t
h
a
t
any
a
n
y
relevant
r
e
l
e
v
a
n
t
environmental
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
thresholds,
t
h
r
e
s
h
o
l
d
s
,
as
a
s
established
e
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
under
u
n
d
e
r
Serandia’s
S
e
r
a
n
d
i
a
’
s
legislative
l
e
g
i
s
l
a
t
i
v
e
framework,
f
r
a
m
e
w
o
r
k
,
are
a
r
e
identified
i
d
e
n
t
i
fi
e
d
and
a
n
d
adhered
a
d
h
e
r
e
d
to
t
o
prior
p
r
i
o
r
to
t
o
execution.
e
x
e
c
u
t
i
o
n
.
3.2
3
.
2
Regulatory
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
o
r
y
Compliance
C
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
Refer
R
e
f
e
r
to
t
o
[3]
[
3
]
[Reference
[
R
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
origin
o
r
i
g
i
n
not
n
o
t
found].
f
o
u
n
d
]
.
3.3
3
.
3
Order
O
r
d
e
r
of
o
f
Precedence
P
r
e
c
e
d
e
n
c
e
All
A
l
l
applicable
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
acts,
a
c
t
s
,
laws,
l
a
w
s
,
rules,
r
u
l
e
s
,
and
a
n
d
regulations
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
for
f
o
r
PROJECT
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
ALPINE
A
L
P
I
N
E
shall
s
h
a
l
l
align
a
l
i
g
n
with
w
i
t
h
those
t
h
o
s
e
enforced
e
n
f
o
r
c
e
d
for
f
o
r
offshore
o
ff
s
h
o
r
e
operations
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
within
w
i
t
h
i
n
Serandia.
S
e
r
a
n
d
i
a
.
In
I
n
cases
c
a
s
e
s
where
w
h
e
r
e
multiple
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e
regulatory
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
o
r
y
frameworks
f
r
a
m
e
w
o
r
k
s
overlap,
o
v
e
r
l
a
p
,
the
t
h
e
most
m
o
s
t
stringent
s
t
r
i
n
g
e
n
t
requirement
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
will
w
i
l
l
take
t
a
k
e
precedence.
p
r
e
c
e
d
e
n
c
e
.
The
T
h
e
hierarchy
h
i
e
r
a
r
c
h
y
of
o
f
application
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
shall
s
h
a
l
l
be
b
e
as
a
s
follows
f
o
l
l
o
w
s
(with
(
w
i
t
h
1
1
being
b
e
i
n
g
the
t
h
e
highest):
h
i
g
h
e
s
t
)
:
granularity=word tetml={elements={line} glyphdetails={all}} contentanalysis={punctuationbreaks=false dehyphenate=false shadowdetect=false} layoutanalysis={tabledetect=0 layoutdetect=3} structureanalysis={list=true}
-
Serandian
S
e
r
a
n
d
i
a
n
national
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
laws,
l
a
w
s
,
regulations,
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
and
a
n
d
any
a
n
y
international
i
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
conventions
c
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
s
ratified
r
a
t
i
fi
e
d
by
b
y
Serandia
S
e
r
a
n
d
i
a
pertaining
p
e
r
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
to
t
o
offshore
o
ff
s
h
o
r
e
exploration
e
x
p
l
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
and
a
n
d
production.
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
.
-
Applicable
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
classification
c
l
a
s
s
i
fi
c
a
t
i
o
n
society
s
o
c
i
e
t
y
requirements,
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
,
vessel
v
e
s
s
e
l
flag
fl
a
g
regulations,
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
marine
m
a
r
i
n
e
international
i
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
standards,
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
,
and
a
n
d
certification
c
e
r
t
i
fi
c
a
t
i
o
n
body
b
o
d
y
rules
r
u
l
e
s
for
f
o
r
the
t
h
e
specific
s
p
e
c
i
fi
c
equipment
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
category.
c
a
t
e
g
o
r
y
.
-
Approved
A
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
PROJECT
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
ALPINE
A
L
P
I
N
E
documentation
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
(Appendix
(
A
p
p
e
n
d
i
x
D).
D
)
.
-
PRIME
P
R
I
M
E
ENERGY
E
N
E
R
G
Y
corporate
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
engineering
e
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
standards
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
(latest
(
l
a
t
e
s
t
revision
r
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
to
t
o
be
b
e
applied
a
p
p
l
i
e
d
to
t
o
new
n
e
w
equipment
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
per
p
e
r
[3]
[
3
]
[Reference
[
R
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
origin
o
r
i
g
i
n
not
n
o
t
found]).
f
o
u
n
d
]
)
.
-
Internationally
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
l
y
recognized
r
e
c
o
g
n
i
z
e
d
codes
c
o
d
e
s
and
a
n
d
standards
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
relevant
r
e
l
e
v
a
n
t
to
t
o
the
t
h
e
scope
s
c
o
p
e
of
o
f
work.
w
o
r
k
.
4
4
PROJECT
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
DESCRIPTION
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
4.1
4
.
1
Development
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Scenario
S
c
e
n
a
r
i
o
The
T
h
e
Aurora-1
A
u
r
o
r
a
-
1
gas
g
a
s
discovery
d
i
s
c
o
v
e
r
y
well
w
e
l
l
was
w
a
s
drilled
d
r
i
l
l
e
d
in
i
n
2,436
2
,
4
3
6
ft
f
t
water
w
a
t
e
r
depth
d
e
p
t
h
by
b
y
TerraNova
T
e
r
r
a
N
o
v
a
Drilling
D
r
i
l
l
i
n
g
Co.
C
o
.
under
u
n
d
e
r
contract
c
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
with
w
i
t
h
a
a
prior
p
r
i
o
r
project
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
operator,
o
p
e
r
a
t
o
r
,
reaching
r
e
a
c
h
i
n
g
total
t
o
t
a
l
depth
d
e
p
t
h
on
o
n
7
7
June
J
u
n
e
2002
2
0
0
2
at
a
t
a
a
true
t
r
u
e
vertical
v
e
r
t
i
c
a
l
depth
d
e
p
t
h
subsea
s
u
b
s
e
a
(TVDSS)
(
T
V
D
S
S
)
of
o
f
13,100
1
3
,
1
0
0
ft.
f
t
.
Following
F
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
a
a
series
s
e
r
i
e
s
of
o
f
unsuccessful
u
n
s
u
c
c
e
s
s
f
u
l
development
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
proposals
p
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
s
for
f
o
r
Aurora-1
A
u
r
o
r
a
-
1
and
a
n
d
nearby
n
e
a
r
b
y
discoveries,
d
i
s
c
o
v
e
r
i
e
s
,
the
t
h
e
acreage
a
c
r
e
a
g
e
was
w
a
s
relinquished.
r
e
l
i
n
q
u
i
s
h
e
d
.
In
I
n
2019,
2
0
1
9
,
the
t
h
e
Serandian
S
e
r
a
n
d
i
a
n
Ministry
M
i
n
i
s
t
r
y
of
o
f
Energy
E
n
e
r
g
y
reoffered
r
e
o
ff
e
r
e
d
the
t
h
e
block
b
l
o
c
k
during
d
u
r
i
n
g
its
i
t
s
offshore
o
ff
s
h
o
r
e
licensing
l
i
c
e
n
s
i
n
g
round,
r
o
u
n
d
,
where
w
h
e
r
e
Stratos
S
t
r
a
t
o
s
Energy
E
n
e
r
g
y
Ltd.
L
t
d
.
(Operator,
(
O
p
e
r
a
t
o
r
,
40%),
4
0
%
)
,
Novara
N
o
v
a
r
a
Petrochem
P
e
t
r
o
c
h
e
m
(30%),
(
3
0
%
)
,
and
a
n
d
Helix
H
e
l
i
x
GeoVentures
G
e
o
V
e
n
t
u
r
e
s
(30%)
(
3
0
%
)
secured
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
exploration
e
x
p
l
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
and
a
n
d
exploitation
e
x
p
l
o
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
rights
r
i
g
h
t
s
under
u
n
d
e
r
the
t
h
e
revised
r
e
v
i
s
e
d
production-sharing
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
-
s
h
a
r
i
n
g
framework.
f
r
a
m
e
w
o
r
k
.
The
T
h
e
proposed
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
development
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
of
o
f
Aurora-1
A
u
r
o
r
a
-
1
provides
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
a
synergistic
s
y
n
e
r
g
i
s
t
i
c
opportunity
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
y
to
t
o
extend
e
x
t
e
n
d
the
t
h
e
operational
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
lifespan
l
i
f
e
s
p
a
n
of
o
f
the
t
h
e
Horizon
H
o
r
i
z
o
n
South
S
o
u
t
h
asset.
a
s
s
e
t
.
Declining
D
e
c
l
i
n
i
n
g
output
o
u
t
p
u
t
from
f
r
o
m
nearby
n
e
a
r
b
y
producing
p
r
o
d
u
c
i
n
g
fields
fi
e
l
d
s
offers
o
ff
e
r
s
capacity
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
in
i
n
the
t
h
e
existing
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
infrastructure,
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
,
enabling
e
n
a
b
l
i
n
g
the
t
h
e
new
n
e
w
project
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
to
t
o
deliver
d
e
l
i
v
e
r
incremental
i
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
reserves
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
s
and
a
n
d
economic
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
benefits
b
e
n
e
fi
t
s
to
t
o
both
b
o
t
h
the
t
h
e
Government
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
of
o
f
Serandia
S
e
r
a
n
d
i
a
and
a
n
d
the
t
h
e
project
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
stakeholders
s
t
a
k
e
h
o
l
d
e
r
s
along
a
l
o
n
g
the
t
h
e
gas
g
a
s
processing
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
i
n
g
and
a
n
d
export
e
x
p
o
r
t
value
v
a
l
u
e
chain—from
c
h
a
i
n
—
f
r
o
m
the
t
h
e
subsea
s
u
b
s
e
a
wellhead
w
e
l
l
h
e
a
d
to
t
o
the
t
h
e
onshore
o
n
s
h
o
r
e
terminals.
t
e
r
m
i
n
a
l
s
.
The
T
h
e
selected
s
e
l
e
c
t
e
d
concept
c
o
n
c
e
p
t
is
i
s
a
a
subsea
s
u
b
s
e
a
tie-back
t
i
e
-
b
a
c
k
to
t
o
the
t
h
e
Central
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
Nexus
N
e
x
u
s
Facility,
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
,
leveraging
l
e
v
e
r
a
g
i
n
g
ullage
u
l
l
a
g
e
in
i
n
late-life
l
a
t
e
-
l
i
f
e
infrastructure
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
and
a
n
d
proximity
p
r
o
x
i
m
i
t
y
to
t
o
existing
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
manifold
m
a
n
i
f
o
l
d
clusters.
c
l
u
s
t
e
r
s
.
The
T
h
e
base
b
a
s
e
plan
p
l
a
n
comprises
c
o
m
p
r
i
s
e
s
two
t
w
o
new
n
e
w
production
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
wells
w
e
l
l
s
tied
t
i
e
d
into
i
n
t
o
Horizon
H
o
r
i
z
o
n
South
S
o
u
t
h
Trunkline
T
r
u
n
k
l
i
n
e
1
1
via
v
i
a
a
a
new
n
e
w
subsea
s
u
b
s
e
a
production
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
flowline.
fl
o
w
l
i
n
e
.
Production
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
from
f
r
o
m
Cluster
C
l
u
s
t
e
r
1
1
will
w
i
l
l
be
b
e
redirected
r
e
d
i
r
e
c
t
e
d
for
f
o
r
processing
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
i
n
g
through
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
Cluster
C
l
u
s
t
e
r
3,
3
,
optimizing
o
p
t
i
m
i
z
i
n
g
field
fi
e
l
d
performance
p
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
while
w
h
i
l
e
minimizing
m
i
n
i
m
i
z
i
n
g
additional
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
topside
t
o
p
s
i
d
e
modifications.
m
o
d
i
fi
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
granularity=word tetml={elements={line} glyphdetails={all}} contentanalysis={punctuationbreaks=false dehyphenate=false shadowdetect=false} layoutanalysis={tabledetect=0 layoutdetect=3} structureanalysis={list=true}
5
5
GENERAL
G
E
N
E
R
A
L
LOCATION
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
DATA
D
A
T
A
-
Climatology
C
l
i
m
a
t
o
l
o
g
y
and
a
n
d
Metocean
M
e
t
o
c
e
a
n
Data
D
a
t
a
Environmental
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
parameters
p
a
r
a
m
e
t
e
r
s
for
f
o
r
the
t
h
e
Pelagia
P
e
l
a
g
i
a
Basin,
B
a
s
i
n
,
including
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
seawater
s
e
a
w
a
t
e
r
temperature
t
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
profiles,
p
r
o
fi
l
e
s
,
current
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
regimes,
r
e
g
i
m
e
s
,
and
a
n
d
wave
w
a
v
e
statistics,
s
t
a
t
i
s
t
i
c
s
,
are
a
r
e
provided
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
in
i
n
Ref.
R
e
f
.
[25].
[
2
5
]
.
These
T
h
e
s
e
datasets
d
a
t
a
s
e
t
s
form
f
o
r
m
the
t
h
e
baseline
b
a
s
e
l
i
n
e
for
f
o
r
offshore
o
ff
s
h
o
r
e
design
d
e
s
i
g
n
criteria
c
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
in
i
n
compliance
c
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
with
w
i
t
h
Serandian
S
e
r
a
n
d
i
a
n
regulatory
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
o
r
y
requirements.
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
-
Water
W
a
t
e
r
Depths
D
e
p
t
h
s
The
T
h
e
Horizon
H
o
r
i
z
o
n
South
S
o
u
t
h
development
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
area
a
r
e
a
spans
s
p
a
n
s
water
w
a
t
e
r
depths
d
e
p
t
h
s
between
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
approximately
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
300
3
0
0
m
m
and
a
n
d
1,200
1
,
2
0
0
m
m
below
b
e
l
o
w
mean
m
e
a
n
sea
s
e
a
level.
l
e
v
e
l
.
-
Offshore
O
ff
s
h
o
r
e
Facility
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
Coordinates
C
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
e
s
The
T
h
e
primary
p
r
i
m
a
r
y
floating
fl
o
a
t
i
n
g
production
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
unit
u
n
i
t
(FPU)
(
F
P
U
)
within
w
i
t
h
i
n
the
t
h
e
Central
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
Nexus
N
e
x
u
s
Facility
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
is
i
s
located
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
at
a
t
the
t
h
e
following
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
reference
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
coordinates:
c
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
e
s
:
Item
I
t
e
m
X
X
[m]
[
m
]
Y
Y
[m]
[
m
]
Latitude
L
a
t
i
t
u
d
e
Longitude
L
o
n
g
i
t
u
d
e
FPU
F
P
U
Centre
C
e
n
t
r
e
572421
5
7
2
4
2
1
9860512
9
8
6
0
5
1
2
1°
1
°
15’
1
5
’
42.868”
4
2
.
8
6
8
”
S
S
117°
1
1
7
°
39’
3
9
’
03.499”
0
3
.
4
9
9
”
E
E
Table
T
a
b
l
e
1
1
–
–
Central
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
Nexus
N
e
x
u
s
Facility
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
FPU
F
P
U
Coordinates
C
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
e
s
-
Onshore
O
n
s
h
o
r
e
Processing
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
i
n
g
Location
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
The
T
h
e
coordinates
c
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
e
s
for
f
o
r
the
t
h
e
onshore
o
n
s
h
o
r
e
receiving
r
e
c
e
i
v
i
n
g
and
a
n
d
processing
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
i
n
g
facilities
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
(ORF)
(
O
R
F
)
associated
a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
with
w
i
t
h
Horizon
H
o
r
i
z
o
n
South
S
o
u
t
h
are
a
r
e
as
a
s
follows:
f
o
l
l
o
w
s
:
-
Latitude:
L
a
t
i
t
u
d
e
:
9,899,144
9
,
8
9
9
,
1
4
4
N
N
to
t
o
9,899,370
9
,
8
9
9
,
3
7
0
N
N
-
Longitude:
L
o
n
g
i
t
u
d
e
:
519,077
5
1
9
,
0
7
7
E
E
to
t
o
519,329
5
1
9
,
3
2
9
E
E
-
Environmental
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
Reference
R
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
Data
D
a
t
a
For
F
o
r
detailed
d
e
t
a
i
l
e
d
metocean
m
e
t
o
c
e
a
n
parameters—including
p
a
r
a
m
e
t
e
r
s
—
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
design
d
e
s
i
g
n
return
r
e
t
u
r
n
periods—refer
p
e
r
i
o
d
s
—
r
e
f
e
r
to
t
o
Ref.
R
e
f
.
[25]:
[
2
5
]
:
Doc
D
o
c
No.
N
o
.
Document
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
Title
T
i
t
l
e
Revision
R
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
RP_A11111v1
R
P
_
A
1
1
1
1
1
v
1
–
–
Main
M
a
i
n
(Feb
(
F
e
b
2012)
2
0
1
2
)
SPS
S
P
S
Basis
B
a
s
i
s
of
o
f
Design
D
e
s
i
g
n
—
—
Table
T
a
b
l
e
2
2
–
–
Metocean
M
e
t
o
c
e
a
n
Reference
R
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
Data
D
a
t
a
Design
D
e
s
i
g
n
return
r
e
t
u
r
n
periods
p
e
r
i
o
d
s
applicable
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
to
t
o
offshore
o
ff
s
h
o
r
e
oil
o
i
l
and
a
n
d
gas
g
a
s
facilities
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
are
a
r
e
governed
g
o
v
e
r
n
e
d
by
b
y
national
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
regulations
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
or
o
r
industry
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
y
codes.
c
o
d
e
s
.
For
F
o
r
guidance
g
u
i
d
a
n
c
e
specific
s
p
e
c
i
fi
c
to
t
o
PRIME
P
R
I
M
E
ENERGY
E
N
E
R
G
Y
projects,
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
,
refer
r
e
f
e
r
to
t
o
Company
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
Standard
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
28842.ENG.OFF.STD
2
8
8
4
2
.
E
N
G
.
O
F
F
.
S
T
D
“Meteo-Oceanographic
“
M
e
t
e
o
-
O
c
e
a
n
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c
Design
D
e
s
i
g
n
Basis”.
B
a
s
i
s
”
.
granularity=word tetml={elements={line} glyphdetails={all}} contentanalysis={punctuationbreaks=false dehyphenate=false shadowdetect=false} layoutanalysis={tabledetect=0 layoutdetect=3} structureanalysis={list=true}
5.2
5
.
2
Geophysical
G
e
o
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
and
a
n
d
Geotechnical
G
e
o
t
e
c
h
n
i
c
a
l
Data
D
a
t
a
5.2.1
5
.
2
.
1
Geotechnical
G
e
o
t
e
c
h
n
i
c
a
l
No
N
o
dedicated
d
e
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
geotechnical
g
e
o
t
e
c
h
n
i
c
a
l
investigation
i
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
has
h
a
s
yet
y
e
t
been
b
e
e
n
performed
p
e
r
f
o
r
m
e
d
for
f
o
r
the
t
h
e
Aurora-1
A
u
r
o
r
a
-
1
development
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
area.
a
r
e
a
.
A
A
comprehensive
c
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
site
s
i
t
e
survey
s
u
r
v
e
y
is
i
s
planned
p
l
a
n
n
e
d
in
i
n
upcoming
u
p
c
o
m
i
n
g
project
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
phases
p
h
a
s
e
s
to
t
o
characterize
c
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
z
e
seabed
s
e
a
b
e
d
soils
s
o
i
l
s
at
a
t
proposed
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
subsea
s
u
b
s
e
a
structure,
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
,
flowline,
fl
o
w
l
i
n
e
,
and
a
n
d
umbilical
u
m
b
i
l
i
c
a
l
installation
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
locations.
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
5.2.2
5
.
2
.
2
Geophysical
G
e
o
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
Geophysical
G
e
o
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
survey
s
u
r
v
e
y
data
d
a
t
a
are
a
r
e
not
n
o
t
currently
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
available
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
for
f
o
r
the
t
h
e
Aurora-1
A
u
r
o
r
a
-
1
project
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
footprint.
f
o
o
t
p
r
i
n
t
.
A
A
future
f
u
t
u
r
e
campaign
c
a
m
p
a
i
g
n
will
w
i
l
l
acquire
a
c
q
u
i
r
e
high-resolution
h
i
g
h
-
r
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
bathymetry
b
a
t
h
y
m
e
t
r
y
and
a
n
d
shallow
s
h
a
l
l
o
w
sub-seabed
s
u
b
-
s
e
a
b
e
d
profiles
p
r
o
fi
l
e
s
to
t
o
support
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
engineering
e
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
and
a
n
d
hazard
h
a
z
a
r
d
assessments.
a
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
s
.
This
T
h
i
s
will
w
i
l
l
include
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
seabed
s
e
a
b
e
d
morphology
m
o
r
p
h
o
l
o
g
y
mapping,
m
a
p
p
i
n
g
,
shallow
s
h
a
l
l
o
w
stratigraphy,
s
t
r
a
t
i
g
r
a
p
h
y
,
and
a
n
d
identification
i
d
e
n
t
i
fi
c
a
t
i
o
n
of
o
f
potential
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
hazards
h
a
z
a
r
d
s
to
t
o
subsea
s
u
b
s
e
a
infrastructure.
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
.
5.2.3
5
.
2
.
3
Bathymetry
B
a
t
h
y
m
e
t
r
y
Data
D
a
t
a
Current
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
bathymetric
b
a
t
h
y
m
e
t
r
i
c
information
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
is
i
s
limited
l
i
m
i
t
e
d
to
t
o
low-resolution
l
o
w
-
r
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
(12.5
(
1
2
.
5
m
m
×
×
12.5
1
2
.
5
m
m
grid)
g
r
i
d
)
data
d
a
t
a
obtained
o
b
t
a
i
n
e
d
from
f
r
o
m
reprocessed
r
e
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
e
d
3D
3
D
seismic
s
e
i
s
m
i
c
datasets.
d
a
t
a
s
e
t
s
.
The
T
h
e
development
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
area
a
r
e
a
is
i
s
characterized
c
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
z
e
d
by
b
y
complex
c
o
m
p
l
e
x
seabed
s
e
a
b
e
d
topography,
t
o
p
o
g
r
a
p
h
y
,
including
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
multiple
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e
submarine
s
u
b
m
a
r
i
n
e
canyons
c
a
n
y
o
n
s
(both
(
b
o
t
h
primary
p
r
i
m
a
r
y
and
a
n
d
tributary),
t
r
i
b
u
t
a
r
y
)
,
distinct
d
i
s
t
i
n
c
t
fault
f
a
u
l
t
lines,
l
i
n
e
s
,
steep
s
t
e
e
p
escarpments,
e
s
c
a
r
p
m
e
n
t
s
,
irregular
i
r
r
e
g
u
l
a
r
slopes,
s
l
o
p
e
s
,
and
a
n
d
isolated
i
s
o
l
a
t
e
d
mounded
m
o
u
n
d
e
d
features.
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
.
Water
W
a
t
e
r
depths
d
e
p
t
h
s
range
r
a
n
g
e
from
f
r
o
m
approximately
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
300
3
0
0
m
m
to
t
o
1,500
1
,
5
0
0
m.
m
.
Figure
F
i
g
u
r
e
3
3
–
–
Regional
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
morphology
m
o
r
p
h
o
l
o
g
y
of
o
f
the
t
h
e
Pelagia
P
e
l
a
g
i
a
Basin
B
a
s
i
n
development
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
zone.
z
o
n
e
.
granularity=word tetml={elements={line} glyphdetails={all}} contentanalysis={punctuationbreaks=false dehyphenate=false shadowdetect=false} layoutanalysis={tabledetect=0 layoutdetect=3} structureanalysis={list=true}
Figure
F
i
g
u
r
e
4
4
–
–
Detailed
D
e
t
a
i
l
e
d
bathymorphic
b
a
t
h
y
m
o
r
p
h
i
c
interpretation
i
n
t
e
r
p
r
e
t
a
t
i
o
n
of
o
f
the
t
h
e
Aurora-1
A
u
r
o
r
a
-
1
sector
s
e
c
t
o
r
from
f
r
o
m
reprocessed
r
e
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
e
d
3D
3
D
seismic
s
e
i
s
m
i
c
volume.
v
o
l
u
m
e
.
5.2.4
5
.
2
.
4
Geohazard
G
e
o
h
a
z
a
r
d
Assessment
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
No
N
o
dedicated
d
e
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
geohazard
g
e
o
h
a
z
a
r
d
studies
s
t
u
d
i
e
s
have
h
a
v
e
been
b
e
e
n
carried
c
a
r
r
i
e
d
out
o
u
t
to
t
o
date
d
a
t
e
for
f
o
r
the
t
h
e
Aurora-1
A
u
r
o
r
a
-
1
development
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
area.
a
r
e
a
.
This
T
h
i
s
assessment
a
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
will
w
i
l
l
form
f
o
r
m
part
p
a
r
t
of
o
f
the
t
h
e
upcoming
u
p
c
o
m
i
n
g
geophysical
g
e
o
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
and
a
n
d
geotechnical
g
e
o
t
e
c
h
n
i
c
a
l
survey
s
u
r
v
e
y
scope.
s
c
o
p
e
.
5.2.5
5
.
2
.
5
Earthquake
E
a
r
t
h
q
u
a
k
e
Data
D
a
t
a
Seismic
S
e
i
s
m
i
c
design
d
e
s
i
g
n
criteria
c
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
for
f
o
r
subsea
s
u
b
s
e
a
structures
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
and
a
n
d
associated
a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
foundations
f
o
u
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
shall
s
h
a
l
l
be
b
e
in
i
n
accordance
a
c
c
o
r
d
a
n
c
e
with
w
i
t
h
ISO
I
S
O
19901-2.
1
9
9
0
1
-
2
.
6
6
RESERVOIR
R
E
S
E
R
V
O
I
R
MANAGEMENT
M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
BASIS
B
A
S
I
S
6.1
6
.
1
Main
M
a
i
n
Reservoir
R
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
Data
D
a
t
a
The
T
h
e
primary
p
r
i
m
a
r
y
reservoir
r
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
identified
i
d
e
n
t
i
fi
e
d
within
w
i
t
h
i
n
the
t
h
e
Aurora-1
A
u
r
o
r
a
-
1
structure
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
of
o
f
PROJECT
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
ALPINE
A
L
P
I
N
E
is
i
s
classified
c
l
a
s
s
i
fi
e
d
as
a
s
T-090
T
-
0
9
0
(equivalent
(
e
q
u
i
v
a
l
e
n
t
to
t
o
legacy
l
e
g
a
c
y
interval
i
n
t
e
r
v
a
l
3130
3
1
3
0
from
f
r
o
m
the
t
h
e
former
f
o
r
m
e
r
operator’s
o
p
e
r
a
t
o
r
’
s
nomenclature).
n
o
m
e
n
c
l
a
t
u
r
e
)
.
This
T
h
i
s
unit
u
n
i
t
was
w
a
s
encountered
e
n
c
o
u
n
t
e
r
e
d
at
a
t
depths
d
e
p
t
h
s
between
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
–2,400
–
2
,
4
0
0
m
m
and
a
n
d
–2,600
–
2
,
6
0
0
m
m
true
t
r
u
e
vertical
v
e
r
t
i
c
a
l
depth
d
e
p
t
h
subsea
s
u
b
s
e
a
(TVDSS).
(
T
V
D
S
S
)
.
Secondary
S
e
c
o
n
d
a
r
y
accumulations
a
c
c
u
m
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
include
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
T-088
T
-
0
8
8
/
/
T-086
T
-
0
8
6
(equivalent
(
e
q
u
i
v
a
l
e
n
t
to
t
o
legacy
l
e
g
a
c
y
3140
3
1
4
0
and
a
n
d
3150)
3
1
5
0
)
and
a
n
d
T-084
T
-
0
8
4
Segment-1
S
e
g
m
e
n
t
-
1
(equivalent
(
e
q
u
i
v
a
l
e
n
t
to
t
o
legacy
l
e
g
a
c
y
3170).
3
1
7
0
)
.
The
T
h
e
field
fi
e
l
d
is
i
s
a
a
Pliocene-age
P
l
i
o
c
e
n
e
-
a
g
e
turbidite
t
u
r
b
i
d
i
t
e
system,
s
y
s
t
e
m
,
deposited
d
e
p
o
s
i
t
e
d
approximately
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
3.5
3
.
5
million
m
i
l
l
i
o
n
years
y
e
a
r
s
ago
a
g
o
as
a
s
toe-of-slope
t
o
e
-
o
f
-
s
l
o
p
e
fans
f
a
n
s
prograding
p
r
o
g
r
a
d
i
n
g
across
a
c
r
o
s
s
an
a
n
anticlinal
a
n
t
i
c
l
i
n
a
l
structure
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
associated
a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
with
w
i
t
h
the
t
h
e
broader
b
r
o
a
d
e
r
Pelagia
P
e
l
a
g
i
a
Basin
B
a
s
i
n
Hub
H
u
b
anticline.
a
n
t
i
c
l
i
n
e
.
Hydrocarbon
H
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
granularity=word tetml={elements={line} glyphdetails={all}} contentanalysis={punctuationbreaks=false dehyphenate=false shadowdetect=false} layoutanalysis={tabledetect=0 layoutdetect=3} structureanalysis={list=true}
trapping
t
r
a
p
p
i
n
g
is
i
s
predominantly
p
r
e
d
o
m
i
n
a
n
t
l
y
stratigraphic,
s
t
r
a
t
i
g
r
a
p
h
i
c
,
driven
d
r
i
v
e
n
by
b
y
the
t
h
e
up-dip
u
p
-
d
i
p
pinch-out
p
i
n
c
h
-
o
u
t
of
o
f
turbiditic
t
u
r
b
i
d
i
t
i
c
sequences
s
e
q
u
e
n
c
e
s
into
i
n
t
o
a
a
slope
s
l
o
p
e
valley.
v
a
l
l
e
y
.
The
T
h
e
T-090
T
-
0
9
0
interval
i
n
t
e
r
v
a
l
represents
r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
s
the
t
h
e
principal
p
r
i
n
c
i
p
a
l
gas-bearing
g
a
s
-
b
e
a
r
i
n
g
horizon,
h
o
r
i
z
o
n
,
accounting
a
c
c
o
u
n
t
i
n
g
for
f
o
r
roughly
r
o
u
g
h
l
y
74%
7
4
%
of
o
f
the
t
h
e
estimated
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
gas-in-place.
g
a
s
-
i
n
-
p
l
a
c
e
.
Seismic
S
e
i
s
m
i
c
amplitude
a
m
p
l
i
t
u
d
e
and
a
n
d
envelope
e
n
v
e
l
o
p
e
attribute
a
t
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
analyses
a
n
a
l
y
s
e
s
illustrate
i
l
l
u
s
t
r
a
t
e
a
a
channel-fed
c
h
a
n
n
e
l
-
f
e
d
fan
f
a
n
geometry
g
e
o
m
e
t
r
y
sourced
s
o
u
r
c
e
d
from
f
r
o
m
the
t
h
e
northwest.
n
o
r
t
h
w
e
s
t
.
Depositional
D
e
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
lobes
l
o
b
e
s
display
d
i
s
p
l
a
y
compensational
c
o
m
p
e
n
s
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
stacking
s
t
a
c
k
i
n
g
with
w
i
t
h
evidence
e
v
i
d
e
n
c
e
of
o
f
lateral
l
a
t
e
r
a
l
amalgamation,
a
m
a
l
g
a
m
a
t
i
o
n
,
which
w
h
i
c
h
complicates
c
o
m
p
l
i
c
a
t
e
s
architectural
a
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
interpretation.
i
n
t
e
r
p
r
e
t
a
t
i
o
n
.
No
N
o
gas–water
g
a
s
–
w
a
t
e
r
contact
c
o
n
t
a
c
t
(GWC)
(
G
W
C
)
was
w
a
s
directly
d
i
r
e
c
t
l
y
observed
o
b
s
e
r
v
e
d
in
i
n
well
w
e
l
l
control;
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
;
however,
h
o
w
e
v
e
r
,
amplitude
a
m
p
l
i
t
u
d
e
cut-off
c
u
t
-
o
ff
suggests
s
u
g
g
e
s
t
s
a
a
contact
c
o
n
t
a
c
t
near
n
e
a
r
–2,560
–
2
,
5
6
0
m
m
subsea
s
u
b
s
e
a
level.
l
e
v
e
l
.
The
T
h
e
T-088
T
-
0
8
8
/
/
T-086
T
-
0
8
6
reservoirs
r
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
s
were
w
e
r
e
encountered
e
n
c
o
u
n
t
e
r
e
d
approximately
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
30–40
3
0
–
4
0
m
m
below
b
e
l
o
w
the
t
h
e
primary
p
r
i
m
a
r
y
target,
t
a
r
g
e
t
,
comprising
c
o
m
p
r
i
s
i
n
g
two
t
w
o
distinct
d
i
s
t
i
n
c
t
sand
s
a
n
d
bodies
b
o
d
i
e
s
identified
i
d
e
n
t
i
fi
e
d
in
i
n
the
t
h
e
Aurora-1
A
u
r
o
r
a
-
1
and
a
n
d
Epsilon-4
E
p
s
i
l
o
n
-
4
wells.
w
e
l
l
s
.
MDT
M
D
T
pressure
p
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
testing
t
e
s
t
i
n
g
confirmed
c
o
n
fi
r
m
e
d
a
a
consistent
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
gas–water
g
a
s
–
w
a
t
e
r
gradient
g
r
a
d
i
e
n
t
across
a
c
r
o
s
s
both
b
o
t
h
wells,
w
e
l
l
s
,
with
w
i
t
h
GWC
G
W
C
observed
o
b
s
e
r
v
e
d
at
a
t
–2,556
–
2
,
5
5
6
m
m
in
i
n
Aurora-1,
A
u
r
o
r
a
-
1
,
while
w
h
i
l
e
Epsilon-4
E
p
s
i
l
o
n
-
4
proved
p
r
o
v
e
d
water-bearing.
w
a
t
e
r
-
b
e
a
r
i
n
g
.
These
T
h
e
s
e
intervals
i
n
t
e
r
v
a
l
s
are
a
r
e
interpreted
i
n
t
e
r
p
r
e
t
e
d
as
a
s
more
m
o
r
e
channelized
c
h
a
n
n
e
l
i
z
e
d
deposits,
d
e
p
o
s
i
t
s
,
with
w
i
t
h
two
t
w
o
primary
p
r
i
m
a
r
y
fairways
f
a
i
r
w
a
y
s
trending
t
r
e
n
d
i
n
g
NW–S
N
W
–
S
and
a
n
d
NW–SE.
N
W
–
S
E
.
Localized
L
o
c
a
l
i
z
e
d
bottom-current
b
o
t
t
o
m
-
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
reworking
r
e
w
o
r
k
i
n
g
and
a
n
d
crevasse
c
r
e
v
a
s
s
e
splays
s
p
l
a
y
s
are
a
r
e
inferred
i
n
f
e
r
r
e
d
in
i
n
the
t
h
e
southeastern
s
o
u
t
h
e
a
s
t
e
r
n
portion
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
of
o
f
the
t
h
e
block.
b
l
o
c
k
.
The
T
h
e
basal
b
a
s
a
l
T-084
T
-
0
8
4
reservoir
r
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
constitutes
c
o
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
e
s
the
t
h
e
lowest
l
o
w
e
s
t
sand
s
a
n
d
package
p
a
c
k
a
g
e
of
o
f
the
t
h
e
Pliocene
P
l
i
o
c
e
n
e
slope-valley
s
l
o
p
e
-
v
a
l
l
e
y
system.
s
y
s
t
e
m
.
Seismic
S
e
i
s
m
i
c
RMS
R
M
S
amplitude
a
m
p
l
i
t
u
d
e
extractions
e
x
t
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
s
indicate
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
possible
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
channelized
c
h
a
n
n
e
l
i
z
e
d
features
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
near
n
e
a
r
Aurora-1
A
u
r
o
r
a
-
1
and
a
n
d
depositional
d
e
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
lobe
l
o
b
e
development
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
to
t
o
the
t
h
e
south
s
o
u
t
h
of
o
f
Epsilon-4.
E
p
s
i
l
o
n
-
4
.
Gas
G
a
s
saturation
s
a
t
u
r
a
t
i
o
n
was
w
a
s
confirmed
c
o
n
fi
r
m
e
d
in
i
n
Aurora-1,
A
u
r
o
r
a
-
1
,
with
w
i
t
h
GWC
G
W
C
measured
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
d
at
a
t
–2,626
–
2
,
6
2
6
m
m
TVDSS
T
V
D
S
S
by
b
y
MDT,
M
D
T
,
while
w
h
i
l
e
Epsilon-4
E
p
s
i
l
o
n
-
4
did
d
i
d
not
n
o
t
penetrate
p
e
n
e
t
r
a
t
e
this
t
h
i
s
horizon.
h
o
r
i
z
o
n
.
MDT
M
D
T
data
d
a
t
a
also
a
l
s
o
indicate
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
T-084
T
-
0
8
4
is
i
s
moderately
m
o
d
e
r
a
t
e
l
y
overpressured
o
v
e
r
p
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
d
relative
r
e
l
a
t
i
v
e
to
t
o
overlying
o
v
e
r
l
y
i
n
g
sands.
s
a
n
d
s
.
Petrophysical
P
e
t
r
o
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
evaluation
e
v
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
from
f
r
o
m
the
t
h
e
2020
2
0
2
0
Integrated
I
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d
Reservoir
R
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
Study
S
t
u
d
y
confirmed
c
o
n
fi
r
m
e
d
net
n
e
t
pay
p
a
y
and
a
n
d
reservoir
r
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
quality
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
in
i
n
both
b
o
t
h
Aurora-1
A
u
r
o
r
a
-
1
and
a
n
d
Epsilon-4
E
p
s
i
l
o
n
-
4
wells
w
e
l
l
s
across
a
c
r
o
s
s
T-090,
T
-
0
9
0
,
T-088
T
-
0
8
8
/
/
T-086,
T
-
0
8
6
,
and
a
n
d
T-
T
-
084
0
8
4
intervals.
i
n
t
e
r
v
a
l
s
.
The
T
h
e
results
r
e
s
u
l
t
s
are
a
r
e
summarized
s
u
m
m
a
r
i
z
e
d
below.
b
e
l
o
w
.
Well
W
e
l
l
Reservoir
R
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
Gross
G
r
o
s
s
Interval
I
n
t
e
r
v
a
l
(m
(
m
TVD)
T
V
D
)
Net
N
e
t
Reservoir
R
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
(m
(
m
TVD)
T
V
D
)
NTG
N
T
G
Avg.
A
v
g
.
Porosity
P
o
r
o
s
i
t
y
(PHIE)
(
P
H
I
E
)
Avg.
A
v
g
.
Water
W
a
t
e
r
Saturation
S
a
t
u
r
a
t
i
o
n
(Sw)
(
S
w
)
Avg.
A
v
g
.
Permeability
P
e
r
m
e
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
(mD)
(
m
D
)
Aurora-1
A
u
r
o
r
a
-
1
T-090
T
-
0
9
0
23
2
3
21
2
1
0.90
0
.
9
0
0.25
0
.
2
5
0.42
0
.
4
2
76
7
6
Epsilon-4
E
p
s
i
l
o
n
-
4
54
5
4
43
4
3
0.80
0
.
8
0
0.26
0
.
2
6
0.45
0
.
4
5
129
1
2
9
Aurora-1
A
u
r
o
r
a
-
1
T-088/086
T
-
0
8
8
/
0
8
6
72
7
2
34
3
4
0.46
0
.
4
6
0.24
0
.
2
4
0.48
0
.
4
8
109
1
0
9
Epsilon-4
E
p
s
i
l
o
n
-
4
55
5
5
24
2
4
0.43
0
.
4
3
0.25
0
.
2
5
—
—
177
1
7
7
Aurora-1
A
u
r
o
r
a
-
1
T-084
T
-
0
8
4
21
2
1
20
2
0
0.94
0
.
9
4
0.30
0
.
3
0
0.16
0
.
1
6
288
2
8
8
Epsilon-4
E
p
s
i
l
o
n
-
4
Not
N
o
t
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
penetrated
p
e
n
e
t
r
a
t
e
d
Table
T
a
b
l
e
6
6
–
–
Average
A
v
e
r
a
g
e
Reservoir
R
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
Properties
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
from
f
r
o
m
Aurora-1
A
u
r
o
r
a
-
1
and
a
n
d
Epsilon-4
E
p
s
i
l
o
n
-
4
Wells
W
e
l
l
s
granularity=word tetml={elements={line} glyphdetails={all}} contentanalysis={punctuationbreaks=false dehyphenate=false shadowdetect=false} layoutanalysis={tabledetect=0 layoutdetect=3} structureanalysis={list=true}
A
A
3D
3
D
static
s
t
a
t
i
c
model
m
o
d
e
l
has
h
a
s
been
b
e
e
n
constructed,
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
e
d
,
integrating
i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
i
n
g
seismic,
s
e
i
s
m
i
c
,
well,
w
e
l
l
,
and
a
n
d
analogue
a
n
a
l
o
g
u
e
data
d
a
t
a
to
t
o
better
b
e
t
t
e
r
capture
c
a
p
t
u
r
e
reservoir
r
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
architecture
a
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
e
and
a
n
d
original
o
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
gas-in-place
g
a
s
-
i
n
-
p
l
a
c
e
estimates.
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
.
Case
C
a
s
e
Avg
A
v
g
NTG
N
T
G
[%]
[
%
]
Avg
A
v
g
Porosity
P
o
r
o
s
i
t
y
[%]
[
%
]
Avg
A
v
g
Water
W
a
t
e
r
Saturation
S
a
t
u
r
a
t
i
o
n
[%]
[
%
]
Reference
R
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
Case
C
a
s
e
67
6
7
27
2
7
39
3
9
T-090
T
-
0
9
0
75
7
5
27
2
7
41
4
1
T-088/086
T
-
0
8
8
/
0
8
6
43
4
3
25
2
5
44
4
4
T-084
T
-
0
8
4
83
8
3
33
3
3
20
2
0
Table
T
a
b
l
e
7
7
–
–
Average
A
v
e
r
a
g
e
Reservoir
R
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
Properties
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
from
f
r
o
m
Volumetric
V
o
l
u
m
e
t
r
i
c
Modeling
M
o
d
e
l
i
n
g
No
N
o
PVT
P
V
T
experiments
e
x
p
e
r
i
m
e
n
t
s
have
h
a
v
e
yet
y
e
t
been
b
e
e
n
conducted
c
o
n
d
u
c
t
e
d
on
o
n
recovered
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
e
d
cores
c
o
r
e
s
from
f
r
o
m
PROJECT
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
ALPINE.
A
L
P
I
N
E
.
Fluid
F
l
u
i
d
characterization
c
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
was
w
a
s
therefore
t
h
e
r
e
f
o
r
e
derived
d
e
r
i
v
e
d
from
f
r
o
m
MDT
M
D
T
sampling
s
a
m
p
l
i
n
g
at
a
t
T-090,
T
-
0
9
0
,
with
w
i
t
h
analysis
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
performed
p
e
r
f
o
r
m
e
d
at
a
t
2,487
2
,
4
8
7
m
m
depth,
d
e
p
t
h
,
3,903
3
,
9
0
3
psia
p
s
i
a
reservoir
r
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
pressure,
p
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
,
and
a
n
d
151
1
5
1
°F
°
F
reservoir
r
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
temperature.
t
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
.
Results
R
e
s
u
l
t
s
indicate
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
a
a
methane-rich
m
e
t
h
a
n
e
-
r
i
c
h
gas
g
a
s
(C1
(
C
1
content
c
o
n
t
e
n
t
98.3%),
9
8
.
3
%
)
,
with
w
i
t
h
a
a
gas
g
a
s
gravity
g
r
a
v
i
t
y
of
o
f
0.58
0
.
5
8
and
a
n
d
condensate–gas
c
o
n
d
e
n
s
a
t
e
–
g
a
s
ratio
r
a
t
i
o
(CGR)
(
C
G
R
)
of
o
f
5.8
5
.
8
stb/MMscf.
s
t
b
/
M
M
s
c
f
.
The
T
h
e
dataset
d
a
t
a
s
e
t
was
w
a
s
calibrated
c
a
l
i
b
r
a
t
e
d
through
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
an
a
n
equation-of-state
e
q
u
a
t
i
o
n
-
o
f
-
s
t
a
t
e
model
m
o
d
e
l
(PVTi),
(
P
V
T
i
)
,
and
a
n
d
the
t
h
e
T-090
T
-
0
9
0
fluid
fl
u
i
d
properties
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
are
a
r
e
currently
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
applied
a
p
p
l
i
e
d
to
t
o
secondary
s
e
c
o
n
d
a
r
y
reservoirs
r
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
s
for
f
o
r
preliminary
p
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
design.
d
e
s
i
g
n
.
Properties
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
Value
V
a
l
u
e
Reservoir
R
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
Pressure
P
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
(bara)
(
b
a
r
a
)
270–272
2
7
0
–
2
7
2
Reservoir
R
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
Temperature
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
(°C)
(
°
C
)
73–74
7
3
–
7
4
Table
T
a
b
l
e
8
8
–
–
Reservoir
R
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
Fluid
F
l
u
i
d
Conditions
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
The
T
h
e
Aurora-2
A
u
r
o
r
a
-
2
well,
w
e
l
l
,
drilled
d
r
i
l
l
e
d
in
i
n
May
M
a
y
2021,
2
0
2
1
,
further
f
u
r
t
h
e
r
confirmed
c
o
n
fi
r
m
e
d
reservoir
r
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
quality
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
in
i
n
the
t
h
e
T-090
T
-
0
9
0
interval.
i
n
t
e
r
v
a
l
.
Full
F
u
l
l
core
c
o
r
e
and
a
n
d
PVT
P
V
T
analysis
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
remain
r
e
m
a
i
n
pending
p
e
n
d
i
n
g
at
a
t
the
t
h
e
time
t
i
m
e
of
o
f
this
t
h
i
s
Basis
B
a
s
i
s
of
o
f
Design.
D
e
s
i
g
n
.
6.2
6
.
2
Reservoir
R
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
Fluid
F
l
u
i
d
Composition
C
o
m
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
The
T
h
e
molar
m
o
l
a
r
composition
c
o
m
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
of
o
f
the
t
h
e
produced
p
r
o
d
u
c
e
d
fluid
fl
u
i
d
from
f
r
o
m
Aurora-1
A
u
r
o
r
a
-
1
(T-090)
(
T
-
0
9
0
)
is
i
s
summarized
s
u
m
m
a
r
i
z
e
d
below:
b
e
l
o
w
:
Component
C
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
%mol
%
m
o
l
MW
M
W
Specific
S
p
e
c
i
fi
c
Gravity
G
r
a
v
i
t
y
Critical
C
r
i
t
i
c
a
l
Temp.
T
e
m
p
.
(°C)
(
°
C
)
Critical
C
r
i
t
i
c
a
l
Pressure
P
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
(bara)
(
b
a
r
a
)
Acentric
A
c
e
n
t
r
i
c
Factor
F
a
c
t
o
r
Boiling
B
o
i
l
i
n
g
Temp.
T
e
m
p
.
(°C)
(
°
C
)
N₂
N
₂
0.040
0
.
0
4
0
28.01
2
8
.
0
1
—
—
–147.0
–
1
4
7
.
0
33.9
3
3
.
9
0.0400
0
.
0
4
0
0
–195.8
–
1
9
5
.
8
89.8
8
9
.
8
CO₂
C
O
₂
0.919
0
.
9
1
9
44.01
4
4
.
0
1
—
—
31.1
3
1
.
1
73.8
7
3
.
8
0.2250
0
.
2
2
5
0
–78.5
–
7
8
.
5
94.0
9
4
.
0
C1
C
1
98.200
9
8
.
2
0
0
16.04
1
6
.
0
4
—
—
–82.6
–
8
2
.
6
46.0
4
6
.
0
0.0080
0
.
0
0
8
0
–161.6
–
1
6
1
.
6
99.0
9
9
.
0
Critical
C
r
i
t
i
c
a
l
Vol.
V
o
l
.
(cm³/mol)
(
c
m
³
/
m
o
l
)
C2
C
2
0.200
0
.
2
0
0
30.07
3
0
.
0
7
—
—
32.3
3
2
.
3
48.8
4
8
.
8
0.0980
0
.
0
9
8
0
–88.6
–
8
8
.
6
148.0
1
4
8
.
0
C3
C
3
0.090
0
.
0
9
0
44.10
4
4
.
1
0
—
—
96.7
9
6
.
7
42.5
4
2
.
5
0.1520
0
.
1
5
2
0
–42.5
–
4
2
.
5
203.0
2
0
3
.
0
i-C4
i
-
C
4
0.020
0
.
0
2
0
58.12
5
8
.
1
2
—
—
135.0
1
3
5
.
0
36.5
3
6
.
5
0.1760
0
.
1
7
6
0
–11.8
–
1
1
.
8
263.0
2
6
3
.
0
n-C4
n
-
C
4
0.020
0
.
0
2
0
58.12
5
8
.
1
2
—
—
152.1
1
5
2
.
1
38.0
3
8
.
0
0.1930
0
.
1
9
3
0
0.5
0
.
5
255.0
2
5
5
.
0
i-C5
i
-
C
5
0.010
0
.
0
1
0
72.15
7
2
.
1
5
—
—
187.3
1
8
7
.
3
33.8
3
3
.
8
0.2270
0
.
2
2
7
0
27.9
2
7
.
9
306.0
3
0
6
.
0
granularity=word tetml={elements={line} glyphdetails={all}} contentanalysis={punctuationbreaks=false dehyphenate=false shadowdetect=false} layoutanalysis={tabledetect=0 layoutdetect=3} structureanalysis={list=true}
n-C5
n
-
C
5
0.010
0
.
0
1
0
72.15
7
2
.
1
5
—
—
196.5
1
9
6
.
5
33.7
3
3
.
7
0.2510
0
.
2
5
1
0
36.1
3
6
.
1
304.0
3
0
4
.
0
C6
C
6
0.011
0
.
0
1
1
86.18
8
6
.
1
8
0.664
0
.
6
6
4
234.3
2
3
4
.
3
29.7
2
9
.
7
0.2960
0
.
2
9
6
0
68.8
6
8
.
8
370.0
3
7
0
.
0
C7
C
7
0.097
0
.
0
9
7
96.00
9
6
.
0
0
0.702
0
.
7
0
2
260.7
2
6
0
.
7
28.7
2
8
.
7
0.3371
0
.
3
3
7
1
92.0
9
2
.
0
521.9
5
2
1
.
9
C8
C
8
0.079
0
.
0
7
9
107.00
1
0
7
.
0
0
0.730
0
.
7
3
0
282.3
2
8
2
.
3
26.8
2
6
.
8
0.3740
0
.
3
7
4
0
116.8
1
1
6
.
8
532.0
5
3
2
.
0
C9
C
9
0.065
0
.
0
6
5
121.00
1
2
1
.
0
0
0.754
0
.
7
5
4
306.9
3
0
6
.
9
24.6
2
4
.
6
0.4202
0
.
4
2
0
2
142.3
1
4
2
.
3
561.5
5
6
1
.
5
C10
C
1
0
0.052
0
.
0
5
2
134.00
1
3
4
.
0
0
0.776
0
.
7
7
6
328.2
3
2
8
.
2
23.5
2
3
.
5
0.4627
0
.
4
6
2
7
165.9
1
6
5
.
9
592.4
5
9
2
.
4
C11
C
1
1
0.041
0
.
0
4
1
147.00
1
4
7
.
0
0
0.795
0
.
7
9
5
348.0
3
4
8
.
0
21.8
2
1
.
8
0.5007
0
.
5
0
0
7
187.3
1
8
7
.
3
628.0
6
2
8
.
0
C12
C
1
2
0.031
0
.
0
3
1
161.00
1
6
1
.
0
0
0.813
0
.
8
1
3
368.1
3
6
8
.
1
20.6
2
0
.
6
0.5428
0
.
5
4
2
8
208.4
2
0
8
.
4
672.2
6
7
2
.
2
C13
C
1
3
0.023
0
.
0
2
3
175.00
1
7
5
.
0
0
0.829
0
.
8
2
9
387.1
3
8
7
.
1
19.7
1
9
.
7
0.5837
0
.
5
8
3
7
227.3
2
2
7
.
3
719.9
7
1
9
.
9
Table
T
a
b
l
e
9
9
–
–
Reservoir
R
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
Fluid
F
l
u
i
d
Composition
C
o
m
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
(Aurora-1
(
A
u
r
o
r
a
-
1
MDT
M
D
T
Sample,
S
a
m
p
l
e
,
T-090)
T
-
0
9
0
)
7.0
7
.
0
DRILLING
D
R
I
L
L
I
N
G
&
&
COMPLETIONS
C
O
M
P
L
E
T
I
O
N
S
7.1
7
.
1
Overview
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
The
T
h
e
field
fi
e
l
d
development
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
concept
c
o
n
c
e
p
t
foresees
f
o
r
e
s
e
e
s
the
t
h
e
drilling
d
r
i
l
l
i
n
g
of
o
f
two
t
w
o
production
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
wells,
w
e
l
l
s
,
provisionally
p
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
a
l
l
y
designated
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d
as
a
s
Well
W
e
l
l
A-3
A
-
3
and
a
n
d
Well
W
e
l
l
A-4.
A
-
4
.
7.2
7
.
2
Target
T
a
r
g
e
t
Coordinates
C
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
e
s
The
T
h
e
following
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
tables
t
a
b
l
e
s
summarize
s
u
m
m
a
r
i
z
e
the
t
h
e
preliminary
p
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
wellhead
w
e
l
l
h
e
a
d
coordinates
c
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
e
s
as
a
s
defined
d
e
fi
n
e
d
under
u
n
d
e
r
current
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
geodetic
g
e
o
d
e
t
i
c
references
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
(UTM
(
U
T
M
/
/
WGS
W
G
S
1984).
1
9
8
4
)
.
Well
W
e
l
l
A-3
A
-
3
Parameter
P
a
r
a
m
e
t
e
r
Value
V
a
l
u
e
Water
W
a
t
e
r
depth
d
e
p
t
h
(m)
(
m
)
811
8
1
1
RKB
R
K
B
elevation
e
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
(m)
(
m
)
25
2
5
Seabed
S
e
a
b
e
d
from
f
r
o
m
RKB
R
K
B
(m)
(
m
)
836
8
3
6
Wellhead
W
e
l
l
h
e
a
d
Coordinates
C
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
e
s
–
–
Offshore
O
ff
s
h
o
r
e
Development
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Area
A
r
e
a
A-3
A
-
3
(Case
(
C
a
s
e
B)
B
)
-
Northing:
N
o
r
t
h
i
n
g
:
9,852,056
9
,
8
5
2
,
0
5
6
m
m
-
Easting:
E
a
s
t
i
n
g
:
583,427
5
8
3
,
4
2
7
m
m
-
Latitude:
L
a
t
i
t
u
d
e
:
1°
1
°
20'
2
0
'
18.163"
1
8
.
1
6
3
"
S
S
-
Longitude:
L
o
n
g
i
t
u
d
e
:
117°
1
1
7
°
44'
4
4
'
59.719"
5
9
.
7
1
9
"
E
E
-
Datum:
D
a
t
u
m
:
WGS
W
G
S
1984,
1
9
8
4
,
UTM
U
T
M
Zone
Z
o
n
e
50S
5
0
S
Well
W
e
l
l
A-4
A
-
4
Parameter
P
a
r
a
m
e
t
e
r
Value
V
a
l
u
e
granularity=word tetml={elements={line} glyphdetails={all}} contentanalysis={punctuationbreaks=false dehyphenate=false shadowdetect=false} layoutanalysis={tabledetect=0 layoutdetect=3} structureanalysis={list=true}
Water
W
a
t
e
r
depth
d
e
p
t
h
(m)
(
m
)
1103
1
1
0
3
RKB
R
K
B
elevation
e
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
(m)
(
m
)
29
2
9
Seabed
S
e
a
b
e
d
from
f
r
o
m
RKB
R
K
B
(m)
(
m
)
1128
1
1
2
8
Wellhead
W
e
l
l
h
e
a
d
Coordinates
C
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
e
s
–
–
Offshore
O
ff
s
h
o
r
e
Development
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Area
A
r
e
a
A-4
A
-
4
-
Northing:
N
o
r
t
h
i
n
g
:
9,851,286
9
,
8
5
1
,
2
8
6
m
m
-
Easting:
E
a
s
t
i
n
g
:
585,820
5
8
5
,
8
2
0
m
m
-
Latitude:
L
a
t
i
t
u
d
e
:
1°
1
°
20'
2
0
'
43.223"
4
3
.
2
2
3
"
S
S
-
Longitude:
L
o
n
g
i
t
u
d
e
:
117°
1
1
7
°
46'
4
6
'
17.159"
1
7
.
1
5
9
"
E
E
-
Datum:
D
a
t
u
m
:
WGS
W
G
S
1984,
1
9
8
4
,
UTM
U
T
M
Zone
Z
o
n
e
50S
5
0
S
7.3
7
.
3
Preliminary
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
Casing
C
a
s
i
n
g
Design
D
e
s
i
g
n
As
A
s
no
n
o
dedicated
d
e
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
pore
p
o
r
e
pressure
p
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
study
s
t
u
d
y
has
h
a
s
yet
y
e
t
been
b
e
e
n
finalized,
fi
n
a
l
i
z
e
d
,
the
t
h
e
casing
c
a
s
i
n
g
program
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
is
i
s
based
b
a
s
e
d
on
o
n
analogues
a
n
a
l
o
g
u
e
s
from
f
r
o
m
previous
p
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
deepwater
d
e
e
p
w
a
t
e
r
projects
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
in
i
n
the
t
h
e
same
s
a
m
e
basin.
b
a
s
i
n
.
The
T
h
e
proposed
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
casing/liner
c
a
s
i
n
g
/
l
i
n
e
r
string
s
t
r
i
n
g
dimensions
d
i
m
e
n
s
i
o
n
s
and
a
n
d
metallurgy
m
e
t
a
l
l
u
r
g
y
are
a
r
e
aligned
a
l
i
g
n
e
d
with
w
i
t
h
industry
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
y
practice
p
r
a
c
t
i
c
e
and
a
n
d
prior
p
r
i
o
r
successful
s
u
c
c
e
s
s
f
u
l
campaigns.
c
a
m
p
a
i
g
n
s
.
Proposed
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Casing
C
a
s
i
n
g
Setting
S
e
t
t
i
n
g
Depths
D
e
p
t
h
s
–
–
Well
W
e
l
l
A-3
A
-
3
-
36”
3
6
”
Conductor
C
o
n
d
u
c
t
o
r
–
–
depth
d
e
p
t
h
906
9
0
6
m
m
MD
M
D
-
20”
2
0
”
Surface
S
u
r
f
a
c
e
Casing
C
a
s
i
n
g
–
–
depth
d
e
p
t
h
1486
1
4
8
6
m
m
MD
M
D
-
13-5/8”
1
3
-
5
/
8
”
Intermediate
I
n
t
e
r
m
e
d
i
a
t
e
–
–
depth
d
e
p
t
h
2100
2
1
0
0
m
m
MD
M
D
-
10-3/4”
1
0
-
3
/
4
”
Liner
L
i
n
e
r
–
–
TOL
T
O
L
2051
2
0
5
1
m
m
MD,
M
D
,
length
l
e
n
g
t
h
1127
1
1
2
7
m,
m
,
overlap
o
v
e
r
l
a
p
120
1
2
0
m
m
Proposed
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Casing
C
a
s
i
n
g
Setting
S
e
t
t
i
n
g
Depths
D
e
p
t
h
s
–
–
Well
W
e
l
l
A-4
A
-
4
-
36”
3
6
”
Conductor
C
o
n
d
u
c
t
o
r
–
–
depth
d
e
p
t
h
1198
1
1
9
8
m
m
MD
M
D
-
20”
2
0
”
Surface
S
u
r
f
a
c
e
Casing
C
a
s
i
n
g
–
–
depth
d
e
p
t
h
1728
1
7
2
8
m
m
MD
M
D
-
13-5/8”
1
3
-
5
/
8
”
Intermediate
I
n
t
e
r
m
e
d
i
a
t
e
–
–
depth
d
e
p
t
h
2250
2
2
5
0
m
m
MD
M
D
-
10-3/4”
1
0
-
3
/
4
”
Liner
L
i
n
e
r
–
–
TOL
T
O
L
2152
2
1
5
2
m
m
MD,
M
D
,
length
l
e
n
g
t
h
1150
1
1
5
0
m,
m
,
overlap
o
v
e
r
l
a
p
120
1
2
0
m
m
-
7”
7
”
Contingency
C
o
n
t
i
n
g
e
n
c
y
Liner
L
i
n
e
r
(if
(
i
f
required)
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
)
–
–
TOL
T
O
L
3182
3
1
8
2
m
m
MD,
M
D
,
length
l
e
n
g
t
h
1023
1
0
2
3
m,
m
,
overlap
o
v
e
r
l
a
p
120
1
2
0
m
m
Corrosion
C
o
r
r
o
s
i
o
n
Considerations
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
Formation
F
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
fluid
fl
u
i
d
sampling
s
a
m
p
l
i
n
g
indicates
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
s
the
t
h
e
presence
p
r
e
s
e
n
c
e
of
o
f
significant
s
i
g
n
i
fi
c
a
n
t
CO₂
C
O
₂
partial
p
a
r
t
i
a
l
pressure,
p
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
,
requiring
r
e
q
u
i
r
i
n
g
corrosion-resistant
c
o
r
r
o
s
i
o
n
-
r
e
s
i
s
t
a
n
t
alloys
a
l
l
o
y
s
for
f
o
r
flow-wetted
fl
o
w
-
w
e
t
t
e
d
tubulars.
t
u
b
u
l
a
r
s
.
The
T
h
e
recommended
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
material
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
is
i
s
granularity=word tetml={elements={line} glyphdetails={all}} contentanalysis={punctuationbreaks=false dehyphenate=false shadowdetect=false} layoutanalysis={tabledetect=0 layoutdetect=3} structureanalysis={list=true}
13Cr
1
3
C
r
(or
(
o
r
Super
S
u
p
e
r
13Cr)
1
3
C
r
)
stainless
s
t
a
i
n
l
e
s
s
steel
s
t
e
e
l
for
f
o
r
production
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
liner
l
i
n
e
r
and
a
n
d
tubing.
t
u
b
i
n
g
.
For
F
o
r
casing
c
a
s
i
n
g
above
a
b
o
v
e
the
t
h
e
packer,
p
a
c
k
e
r
,
carbon
c
a
r
b
o
n
or
o
r
low-alloy
l
o
w
-
a
l
l
o
y
steel
s
t
e
e
l
qualified
q
u
a
l
i
fi
e
d
for
f
o
r
sour
s
o
u
r
service
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
in
i
n
accordance
a
c
c
o
r
d
a
n
c
e
with
w
i
t
h
API
A
P
I
5CT
5
C
T
is
i
s
considered
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
suitable.
s
u
i
t
a
b
l
e
.
7.4
7
.
4
Completion
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
Schematics
S
c
h
e
m
a
t
i
c
s
The
T
h
e
well-completed
w
e
l
l
-
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
strategy
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
has
h
a
s
been
b
e
e
n
developed
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
in
i
n
line
l
i
n
e
with
w
i
t
h
international
i
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
standards
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
and
a
n
d
internal
i
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
well
w
e
l
l
design
d
e
s
i
g
n
procedures,
p
r
o
c
e
d
u
r
e
s
,
incorporating
i
n
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
i
n
g
the
t
h
e
following
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
principles:
p
r
i
n
c
i
p
l
e
s
:
-
Compliance
C
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
with
w
i
t
h
HSE
H
S
E
regulations
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
-
Delivery
D
e
l
i
v
e
r
y
of
o
f
forecasted
f
o
r
e
c
a
s
t
e
d
production
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
rates
r
a
t
e
s
-
Capability
C
a
p
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
for
f
o
r
gas
g
a
s
and
a
n
d
water
w
a
t
e
r
injection
i
n
j
e
c
t
i
o
n
as
a
s
needed
n
e
e
d
e
d
-
Operational
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
safety
s
a
f
e
t
y
and
a
n
d
equipment
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
reliability
r
e
l
i
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
-
Well
W
e
l
l
longevity
l
o
n
g
e
v
i
t
y
over
o
v
e
r
full
f
u
l
l
life
l
i
f
e
cycle
c
y
c
l
e
-
Optimization
O
p
t
i
m
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
of
o
f
rig
r
i
g
time
t
i
m
e
and
a
n
d
cost
c
o
s
t
efficiency
e
ff
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
-
Use
U
s
e
of
o
f
standardized,
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
i
z
e
d
,
field-proven
fi
e
l
d
-
p
r
o
v
e
n
technology
t
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
-
Resilience
R
e
s
i
l
i
e
n
c
e
against
a
g
a
i
n
s
t
worst-case
w
o
r
s
t
-
c
a
s
e
operating
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
conditions
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
Completion
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
Concepts
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
s
Under
U
n
d
e
r
Evaluation
E
v
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
-
Well
W
e
l
l
A-3:
A
-
3
:
Dual-zone
D
u
a
l
-
z
o
n
e
completion
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
within
w
i
t
h
i
n
10-3/4”
1
0
-
3
/
4
”
liner,
l
i
n
e
r
,
using
u
s
i
n
g
Controlled
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
l
e
d
Hydraulic
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
Flow
F
l
o
w
Profile
P
r
o
fi
l
e
(CHFP)
(
C
H
F
P
)
and
a
n
d
smart
s
m
a
r
t
upper
u
p
p
e
r
completion.
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
.
-
Well
W
e
l
l
A-4:
A
-
4
:
Single-zone
S
i
n
g
l
e
-
z
o
n
e
CHFP
C
H
F
P
inside
i
n
s
i
d
e
10-3/4”
1
0
-
3
/
4
”
liner,
l
i
n
e
r
,
with
w
i
t
h
provision
p
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
for
f
o
r
future
f
u
t
u
r
e
dual-zone
d
u
a
l
-
z
o
n
e
configuration
c
o
n
fi
g
u
r
a
t
i
o
n
if
i
f
required.
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
.
Smart
S
m
a
r
t
completion
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
capability
c
a
p
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
will
w
i
l
l
be
b
e
retained
r
e
t
a
i
n
e
d
for
f
o
r
operational
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
flexibility.
fl
e
x
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
.
The
T
h
e
strategy
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
emphasizes
e
m
p
h
a
s
i
z
e
s
larger
l
a
r
g
e
r
completion
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
sizes
s
i
z
e
s
to
t
o
maximize
m
a
x
i
m
i
z
e
gas
g
a
s
deliverability
d
e
l
i
v
e
r
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
compared
c
o
m
p
a
r
e
d
with
w
i
t
h
conventional
c
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
a
l
9-5/8”
9
-
5
/
8
”
liner
l
i
n
e
r
systems.
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
.
Alternative
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
designs
d
e
s
i
g
n
s
may
m
a
y
be
b
e
considered
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
in
i
n
later
l
a
t
e
r
project
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
phases.
p
h
a
s
e
s
.
7.5
7
.
5
Preliminary
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
Metallurgy
M
e
t
a
l
l
u
r
g
y
&
&
Elastomer
E
l
a
s
t
o
m
e
r
Selection
S
e
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
A
A
dedicated
d
e
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
completion
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
material
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
and
a
n
d
elastomer
e
l
a
s
t
o
m
e
r
compatibility
c
o
m
p
a
t
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
study
s
t
u
d
y
has
h
a
s
not
n
o
t
yet
y
e
t
been
b
e
e
n
undertaken.
u
n
d
e
r
t
a
k
e
n
.
Based
B
a
s
e
d
on
o
n
analogues
a
n
a
l
o
g
u
e
s
from
f
r
o
m
prior
p
r
i
o
r
basin
b
a
s
i
n
developments,
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
,
13Cr
1
3
C
r
(or
(
o
r
enhanced
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
d
grades
g
r
a
d
e
s
thereof)
t
h
e
r
e
o
f
)
is
i
s
anticipated
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
to
t
o
be
b
e
the
t
h
e
baseline
b
a
s
e
l
i
n
e
metallurgy
m
e
t
a
l
l
u
r
g
y
for
f
o
r
cost
c
o
s
t
and
a
n
d
corrosion
c
o
r
r
o
s
i
o
n
considerations.
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
This
T
h
i
s
selection
s
e
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
will
w
i
l
l
be
b
e
revisited
r
e
v
i
s
i
t
e
d
during
d
u
r
i
n
g
subsequent
s
u
b
s
e
q
u
e
n
t
project
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
phases
p
h
a
s
e
s
once
o
n
c
e
reservoir
r
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
fluid
fl
u
i
d
characterization
c
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
is
i
s
further
f
u
r
t
h
e
r
refined.
r
e
fi
n
e
d
.
granularity=word tetml={elements={line} glyphdetails={all}} contentanalysis={punctuationbreaks=false dehyphenate=false shadowdetect=false} layoutanalysis={tabledetect=0 layoutdetect=3} structureanalysis={list=true}
8.0
8
.
0
FLUID
F
L
U
I
D
DATA
D
A
T
A
AND
A
N
D
PRODUCTION
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
CHEMISTRY
C
H
E
M
I
S
T
R
Y
8.1
8
.
1
Reservoir
R
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
Fluid
F
l
u
i
d
Properties
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
Given
G
i
v
e
n
the
t
h
e
combination
c
o
m
b
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
of
o
f
high
h
i
g
h
pressure
p
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
and
a
n
d
relatively
r
e
l
a
t
i
v
e
l
y
low
l
o
w
temperature
t
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
expected
e
x
p
e
c
t
e
d
during
d
u
r
i
n
g
both
b
o
t
h
steady-state
s
t
e
a
d
y
-
s
t
a
t
e
and
a
n
d
transient
t
r
a
n
s
i
e
n
t
operations,
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
the
t
h
e
reservoir
r
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
fluids
fl
u
i
d
s
are
a
r
e
predicted
p
r
e
d
i
c
t
e
d
to
t
o
be
b
e
susceptible
s
u
s
c
e
p
t
i
b
l
e
to
t
o
hydrate
h
y
d
r
a
t
e
formation.
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
.
Hydrate
H
y
d
r
a
t
e
risks
r
i
s
k
s
will
w
i
l
l
be
b
e
mitigated
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
e
d
under
u
n
d
e
r
all
a
l
l
scenarios
s
c
e
n
a
r
i
o
s
through
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
continuous
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
o
u
s
injection
i
n
j
e
c
t
i
o
n
of
o
f
lean
l
e
a
n
MEG
M
E
G
solution
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
(80%
(
8
0
%
wt).
w
t
)
.
A
A
supplementary
s
u
p
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
injection
i
n
j
e
c
t
i
o
n
of
o
f
methanol
m
e
t
h
a
n
o
l
will
w
i
l
l
be
b
e
applied
a
p
p
l
i
e
d
during
d
u
r
i
n
g
start-
s
t
a
r
t
-
up
u
p
and
a
n
d
restart
r
e
s
t
a
r
t
operations
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
to
t
o
counteract
c
o
u
n
t
e
r
a
c
t
low-temperature
l
o
w
-
t
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
excursions
e
x
c
u
r
s
i
o
n
s
and
a
n
d
hydrate
h
y
d
r
a
t
e
risks.
r
i
s
k
s
.
No
N
o
issues
i
s
s
u
e
s
are
a
r
e
anticipated
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
with
w
i
t
h
asphaltenes,
a
s
p
h
a
l
t
e
n
e
s
,
foaming,
f
o
a
m
i
n
g
,
or
o
r
emulsion
e
m
u
l
s
i
o
n
stability.
s
t
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
.
However,
H
o
w
e
v
e
r
,
scale
s
c
a
l
e
formation
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
potential
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
is
i
s
assumed
a
s
s
u
m
e
d
to
t
o
be
b
e
present,
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
,
consistent
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
with
w
i
t
h
analogue
a
n
a
l
o
g
u
e
reservoirs
r
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
s
in
i
n
the
t
h
e
basin.
b
a
s
i
n
.
8.2
8
.
2
Reservoir
R
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
Fluid
F
l
u
i
d
Composition
C
o
m
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
Reservoir
R
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
fluid
fl
u
i
d
composition
c
o
m
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
is
i
s
referenced
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
d
in
i
n
Section
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
7.2.
7
.
2
.
8.3
8
.
3
Scale
S
c
a
l
e
Potential
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
Scaling
S
c
a
l
i
n
g
tendencies
t
e
n
d
e
n
c
i
e
s
are
a
r
e
considered
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
comparable
c
o
m
p
a
r
a
b
l
e
to
t
o
neighbouring
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
u
r
i
n
g
developments
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
within
w
i
t
h
i
n
the
t
h
e
basin.
b
a
s
i
n
.
Preventive
P
r
e
v
e
n
t
i
v
e
strategies
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
e
s
will
w
i
l
l
be
b
e
aligned
a
l
i
g
n
e
d
with
w
i
t
h
established
e
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
operating
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
practices
p
r
a
c
t
i
c
e
s
for
f
o
r
carbonate-rich
c
a
r
b
o
n
a
t
e
-
r
i
c
h
produced
p
r
o
d
u
c
e
d
water
w
a
t
e
r
systems.
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
.
8.4
8
.
4
Wax
W
a
x
Formation
F
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
and
a
n
d
Rheology
R
h
e
o
l
o
g
y
No
N
o
wax
w
a
x
deposition,
d
e
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
,
foaming,
f
o
a
m
i
n
g
,
or
o
r
emulsion
e
m
u
l
s
i
o
n
challenges
c
h
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
s
are
a
r
e
expected
e
x
p
e
c
t
e
d
under
u
n
d
e
r
reservoir
r
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
or
o
r
production
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
conditions
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
(see
(
s
e
e
Section
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
9.1).
9
.
1
)
.
8.5
8
.
5
Hydrate
H
y
d
r
a
t
e
Equilibrium
E
q
u
i
l
i
b
r
i
u
m
Curves
C
u
r
v
e
s
Hydrate
H
y
d
r
a
t
e
equilibrium
e
q
u
i
l
i
b
r
i
u
m
curves
c
u
r
v
e
s
were
w
e
r
e
generated
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
e
d
for
f
o
r
reservoir
r
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
fluid
fl
u
i
d
composition
c
o
m
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
(Section
(
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
7.2),
7
.
2
)
,
saturated
s
a
t
u
r
a
t
e
d
at
a
t
reservoir
r
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
conditions
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
of
o
f
30
3
0
bar
b
a
r
and
a
n
d
74°C.
7
4
°
C
.
Figure
F
i
g
u
r
e
5:
5
:
Hydrate
H
y
d
r
a
t
e
formation
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
curves
c
u
r
v
e
s
(to
(
t
o
be
b
e
inserted).
i
n
s
e
r
t
e
d
)
.
8.6
8
.
6
Hydrogen
H
y
d
r
o
g
e
n
Sulphide
S
u
l
p
h
i
d
e
The
T
h
e
reservoir
r
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
fluid
fl
u
i
d
is
i
s
expected
e
x
p
e
c
t
e
d
to
t
o
be
b
e
free
f
r
e
e
of
o
f
H₂S.
H
₂
S
.
8.7
8
.
7
Asphaltenes
A
s
p
h
a
l
t
e
n
e
s
No
N
o
asphaltenes
a
s
p
h
a
l
t
e
n
e
s
are
a
r
e
expected
e
x
p
e
c
t
e
d
in
i
n
the
t
h
e
produced
p
r
o
d
u
c
e
d
hydrocarbons.
h
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
s
.
8.8
8
.
8
Material
M
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
Selection
S
e
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
granularity=word tetml={elements={line} glyphdetails={all}} contentanalysis={punctuationbreaks=false dehyphenate=false shadowdetect=false} layoutanalysis={tabledetect=0 layoutdetect=3} structureanalysis={list=true}
8.8.1
8
.
8
.
1
CO₂
C
O
₂
Corrosion
C
o
r
r
o
s
i
o
n
Produced
P
r
o
d
u
c
e
d
fluids
fl
u
i
d
s
exhibit
e
x
h
i
b
i
t
CO₂
C
O
₂
partial
p
a
r
t
i
a
l
pressure
p
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
sufficient
s
u
ff
i
c
i
e
n
t
to
t
o
cause
c
a
u
s
e
sweet
s
w
e
e
t
corrosion
c
o
r
r
o
s
i
o
n
in
i
n
the
t
h
e
absence
a
b
s
e
n
c
e
of
o
f
H₂S.
H
₂
S
.
Dissolution
D
i
s
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
of
o
f
CO₂
C
O
₂
into
i
n
t
o
condensed
c
o
n
d
e
n
s
e
d
water
w
a
t
e
r
is
i
s
expected,
e
x
p
e
c
t
e
d
,
with
w
i
t
h
concentrations
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
proportional
p
r
o
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
a
l
to
t
o
partial
p
a
r
t
i
a
l
pressure
p
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
and
a
n
d
temperature.
t
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
.
The
T
h
e
material
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
and
a
n
d
corrosion-control
c
o
r
r
o
s
i
o
n
-
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
philosophy
p
h
i
l
o
s
o
p
h
y
emphasizes
e
m
p
h
a
s
i
z
e
s
maintaining
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
integrity
i
n
t
e
g
r
i
t
y
across
a
c
r
o
s
s
the
t
h
e
design
d
e
s
i
g
n
life
l
i
f
e
while
w
h
i
l
e
minimizing
m
i
n
i
m
i
z
i
n
g
cost
c
o
s
t
and
a
n
d
fabrication
f
a
b
r
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
delays.
d
e
l
a
y
s
.
Mitigation
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
methods
m
e
t
h
o
d
s
include:
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
:
-
Corrosion-resistant
C
o
r
r
o
s
i
o
n
-
r
e
s
i
s
t
a
n
t
alloys
a
l
l
o
y
s
and/or
a
n
d
/
o
r
corrosion
c
o
r
r
o
s
i
o
n
allowance
a
l
l
o
w
a
n
c
e
-
Protective
P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
v
e
coatings
c
o
a
t
i
n
g
s
-
Chemical
C
h
e
m
i
c
a
l
inhibition
i
n
h
i
b
i
t
i
o
n
programs
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
-
Cathodic
C
a
t
h
o
d
i
c
protection
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
systems
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
-
Continuous
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
o
u
s
monitoring
m
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
and
a
n
d
inspection
i
n
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
Design
D
e
s
i
g
n
corrosion
c
o
r
r
o
s
i
o
n
allowances:
a
l
l
o
w
a
n
c
e
s
:
-
Process
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
equipment
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
and
a
n
d
piping:
p
i
p
i
n
g
:
3–6
3
–
6
mm
m
m
-
Pipelines:
P
i
p
e
l
i
n
e
s
:
up
u
p
to
t
o
8–10
8
–
1
0
mm,
m
m
,
depending
d
e
p
e
n
d
i
n
g
on
o
n
service
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
Uninhibited
U
n
i
n
h
i
b
i
t
e
d
corrosion
c
o
r
r
o
s
i
o
n
rate:
r
a
t
e
:
estimated
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
0.9
0
.
9
mm/yr
m
m
/
y
r
→
→
~8.8
~
8
.
8
mm
m
m
wall
w
a
l
l
loss
l
o
s
s
over
o
v
e
r
20
2
0
years
y
e
a
r
s
With
W
i
t
h
inhibition:
i
n
h
i
b
i
t
i
o
n
:
reduced
r
e
d
u
c
e
d
to
t
o
0.1
0
.
1
mm/yr
m
m
/
y
r
(based
(
b
a
s
e
d
on
o
n
analogous
a
n
a
l
o
g
o
u
s
fluid
fl
u
i
d
classification
c
l
a
s
s
i
fi
c
a
t
i
o
n
studies)
s
t
u
d
i
e
s
)
Formation
F
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
Water
W
a
t
e
r
Case
C
a
s
e
-
Max
M
a
x
corrosion
c
o
r
r
o
s
i
o
n
rate:
r
a
t
e
:
2.0
2
.
0
mm/yr
m
m
/
y
r
-
Inhibited
I
n
h
i
b
i
t
e
d
rate:
r
a
t
e
:
0.2
0
.
2
mm/yr
m
m
/
y
r
-
Corrosion
C
o
r
r
o
s
i
o
n
allowance
a
l
l
o
w
a
n
c
e
(15
(
1
5
years,
y
e
a
r
s
,
95%
9
5
%
CI
C
I
inhibitor
i
n
h
i
b
i
t
o
r
availability):
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
)
:
4.35
4
.
3
5
mm
m
m
Condensed
C
o
n
d
e
n
s
e
d
Water
W
a
t
e
r
Case
C
a
s
e
-
Max
M
a
x
corrosion
c
o
r
r
o
s
i
o
n
rate:
r
a
t
e
:
2.8
2
.
8
mm/yr
m
m
/
y
r
-
Inhibited
I
n
h
i
b
i
t
e
d
rate:
r
a
t
e
:
0.2
0
.
2
mm/yr
m
m
/
y
r
-
Corrosion
C
o
r
r
o
s
i
o
n
allowance
a
l
l
o
w
a
n
c
e
(15
(
1
5
years,
y
e
a
r
s
,
95%
9
5
%
CI
C
I
inhibitor
i
n
h
i
b
i
t
o
r
availability):
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
)
:
4.95
4
.
9
5
mm
m
m
Flowline
F
l
o
w
l
i
n
e
material
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
basis:
b
a
s
i
s
:
Carbon
C
a
r
b
o
n
steel
s
t
e
e
l
+
+
5
5
mm
m
m
corrosion
c
o
r
r
o
s
i
o
n
allowance,
a
l
l
o
w
a
n
c
e
,
assuming
a
s
s
u
m
i
n
g
>95%
>
9
5
%
inhibitor
i
n
h
i
b
i
t
o
r
availability.
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
.
8.9
8
.
9
Flow
F
l
o
w
Assurance
A
s
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
Flow
F
l
o
w
assurance
a
s
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
considerations
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
are
a
r
e
detailed
d
e
t
a
i
l
e
d
in
i
n
Section
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
9.1.
9
.
1
.
granularity=word tetml={elements={line} glyphdetails={all}} contentanalysis={punctuationbreaks=false dehyphenate=false shadowdetect=false} layoutanalysis={tabledetect=0 layoutdetect=3} structureanalysis={list=true}
8.10
8
.
1
0
Flowing
F
l
o
w
i
n
g
and
a
n
d
Shut-In
S
h
u
t
-
I
n
Conditions
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
8.10.1
8
.
1
0
.
1
Flowing
F
l
o
w
i
n
g
Wellhead
W
e
l
l
h
e
a
d
Pressure
P
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
The
T
h
e
forecasted
f
o
r
e
c
a
s
t
e
d
flowing
fl
o
w
i
n
g
wellhead
w
e
l
l
h
e
a
d
pressures
p
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
s
(FWHP)
(
F
W
H
P
)
for
f
o
r
the
t
h
e
development
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
wells
w
e
l
l
s
are
a
r
e
presented
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
e
d
in
i
n
Table
T
a
b
l
e
12.
1
2
.
Date
D
a
t
e
Project-4
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
-
4
(barg)
(
b
a
r
g
)
Project-3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
-
3
(barg)
(
b
a
r
g
)
Sep-26
S
e
p
-
2
6
206
2
0
6
196
1
9
6
May-27
M
a
y
-
2
7
152
1
5
2
134
1
3
4
Jun-28
J
u
n
-
2
8
125
1
2
5
110
1
1
0
Dec-29
D
e
c
-
2
9
97
9
7
85
8
5
Jun-30
J
u
n
-
3
0
90
9
0
80
8
0
Jun-31
J
u
n
-
3
1
78
7
8
66
6
6
Jun-32
J
u
n
-
3
2
68
6
8
57
5
7
Jun-33
J
u
n
-
3
3
61
6
1
51
5
1
Jun-34
J
u
n
-
3
4
56
5
6
46
4
6
Jun-35
J
u
n
-
3
5
47
4
7
48
4
8
Dec-36
D
e
c
-
3
6
38
3
8
40
4
0
Jan-37
J
a
n
-
3
7
–
–
46
4
6
Table
T
a
b
l
e
12
1
2
–
–
Unconstrained
U
n
c
o
n
s
t
r
a
i
n
e
d
Case,
C
a
s
e
,
Flowing
F
l
o
w
i
n
g
Wellhead
W
e
l
l
h
e
a
d
Pressure
P
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
(FWHP)
(
F
W
H
P
)
8.10.2
8
.
1
0
.
2
Flowing
F
l
o
w
i
n
g
Wellhead
W
e
l
l
h
e
a
d
Temperature
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
Forecasted
F
o
r
e
c
a
s
t
e
d
flowing
fl
o
w
i
n
g
wellhead
w
e
l
l
h
e
a
d
temperatures
t
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
s
upstream
u
p
s
t
r
e
a
m
and
a
n
d
downstream
d
o
w
n
s
t
r
e
a
m
of
o
f
the
t
h
e
pressure
p
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
control
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
valves
v
a
l
v
e
s
are
a
r
e
summarized
s
u
m
m
a
r
i
z
e
d
in
i
n
Tables
T
a
b
l
e
s
13
1
3
and
a
n
d
14.
1
4
.
8.10.3
8
.
1
0
.
3
Topside
T
o
p
s
i
d
e
Arrival
A
r
r
i
v
a
l
Conditions
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
For
F
o
r
the
t
h
e
base
b
a
s
e
case,
c
a
s
e
,
wells
w
e
l
l
s
are
a
r
e
produced
p
r
o
d
u
c
e
d
in
i
n
hybrid
h
y
b
r
i
d
HP/LP
H
P
/
L
P
mode,
m
o
d
e
,
with
w
i
t
h
arrival
a
r
r
i
v
a
l
fluid
fl
u
i
d
temperatures
t
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
s
expected
e
x
p
e
c
t
e
d
between
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
-2°C
-
2
°
C
and
a
n
d
+10°C
+
1
0
°
C
depending
d
e
p
e
n
d
i
n
g
on
o
n
flowrate.
fl
o
w
r
a
t
e
.
8.10.3.1
8
.
1
0
.
3
.
1
Operating
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
Cases
C
a
s
e
s
Base
B
a
s
e
Case:
C
a
s
e
:
two
t
w
o
new
n
e
w
development
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
wells
w
e
l
l
s
are
a
r
e
tied
t
i
e
d
back
b
a
c
k
via
v
i
a
a
a
12”
1
2
”
subsea
s
u
b
s
e
a
production
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
line
l
i
n
e
into
i
n
t
o
the
t
h
e
existing
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
trunkline
t
r
u
n
k
l
i
n
e
system,
s
y
s
t
e
m
,
routed
r
o
u
t
e
d
through
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
an
a
n
intermediate
i
n
t
e
r
m
e
d
i
a
t
e
cluster
c
l
u
s
t
e
r
before
b
e
f
o
r
e
reaching
r
e
a
c
h
i
n
g
the
t
h
e
central
c
e
n
t
r
a
l
production
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
hub.
h
u
b
.
8.10.3.2
8
.
1
0
.
3
.
2
Inlet
I
n
l
e
t
Flowrate
F
l
o
w
r
a
t
e
at
a
t
Host
H
o
s
t
Facility
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
Representative
R
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
production
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
cases
c
a
s
e
s
for
f
o
r
host
h
o
s
t
facility
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
inlet
i
n
l
e
t
conditions
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
are
a
r
e
summarized
s
u
m
m
a
r
i
z
e
d
in
i
n
Table
T
a
b
l
e
15.
1
5
.
These
T
h
e
s
e
cases
c
a
s
e
s
are
a
r
e
used
u
s
e
d
to
t
o
confirm
c
o
n
fi
r
m
processing
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
i
n
g
and
a
n
d
slug
s
l
u
g
catcher
c
a
t
c
h
e
r
capacity.
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
.
8.10.3.3
8
.
1
0
.
3
.
3
Target
T
a
r
g
e
t
LP
L
P
Max
M
a
x
Flowrate
F
l
o
w
r
a
t
e
-
616
6
1
6
MMSCFD
M
M
S
C
F
D
max
m
a
x
flow
fl
o
w
in
i
n
LP
L
P
mode
m
o
d
e
(per
(
p
e
r
production
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
profile)
p
r
o
fi
l
e
)
granularity=word tetml={elements={line} glyphdetails={all}} contentanalysis={punctuationbreaks=false dehyphenate=false shadowdetect=false} layoutanalysis={tabledetect=0 layoutdetect=3} structureanalysis={list=true}
-
With
W
i
t
h
minor
m
i
n
o
r
modifications,
m
o
d
i
fi
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
600
6
0
0
MMSCFD
M
M
S
C
F
D
is
i
s
achievable
a
c
h
i
e
v
a
b
l
e
-
With
W
i
t
h
debottlenecking,
d
e
b
o
t
t
l
e
n
e
c
k
i
n
g
,
720
7
2
0
MMSCFD
M
M
S
C
F
D
can
c
a
n
be
b
e
managed
m
a
n
a
g
e
d
in
i
n
LP
L
P
mode
m
o
d
e
(up
(
u
p
to
t
o
~8,400
~
8
,
4
0
0
m³/h
m
³
/
h
seawater
s
e
a
w
a
t
e
r
consumption)
c
o
n
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
)
8.11
8
.
1
1
Product
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
Specifications
S
p
e
c
i
fi
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
8.11.1
8
.
1
1
.
1
Produced
P
r
o
d
u
c
e
d
Hydrocarbons
H
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
s
Produced
P
r
o
d
u
c
e
d
gas
g
a
s
and
a
n
d
condensate
c
o
n
d
e
n
s
a
t
e
will
w
i
l
l
be
b
e
processed
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
e
d
at
a
t
the
t
h
e
host
h
o
s
t
facility.
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
.
Applicable
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
sales
s
a
l
e
s
specifications
s
p
e
c
i
fi
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
are:
a
r
e
:
Property
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
Specification
S
p
e
c
i
fi
c
a
t
i
o
n
HC
H
C
Dew
D
e
w
Point
P
o
i
n
t
≤
≤
12°C
1
2
°
C
at
a
t
any
a
n
y
pressure
p
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
between
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
52
5
2
barg
b
a
r
g
and
a
n
d
max
m
a
x
export
e
x
p
o
r
t
pressure
p
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
Water
W
a
t
e
r
Dew
D
e
w
Point
P
o
i
n
t
≤
≤
9°C
9
°
C
at
a
t
max
m
a
x
export
e
x
p
o
r
t
pressure
p
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
Water
W
a
t
e
r
content
c
o
n
t
e
n
t
≤
≤
9
9
lb/MMSCF
l
b
/
M
M
S
C
F
(Table
(
T
a
b
l
e
17:
1
7
:
Produced
P
r
o
d
u
c
e
d
Gas/Condensate
G
a
s
/
C
o
n
d
e
n
s
a
t
e
Specifications)
S
p
e
c
i
fi
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
)
8.11.2
8
.
1
1
.
2
Produced
P
r
o
d
u
c
e
d
Water
W
a
t
e
r
Produced
P
r
o
d
u
c
e
d
water
w
a
t
e
r
will
w
i
l
l
be
b
e
treated
t
r
e
a
t
e
d
onboard
o
n
b
o
a
r
d
the
t
h
e
host
h
o
s
t
facility.
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
.
Key
K
e
y
discharge
d
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
specifications:
s
p
e
c
i
fi
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
:
-
Max
M
a
x
HC
H
C
content:
c
o
n
t
e
n
t
:
15
1
5
ppmv
p
p
m
v
(30-day
(
3
0
-
d
a
y
avg),
a
v
g
)
,
42
4
2
ppmv
p
p
m
v
(daily
(
d
a
i
l
y
peak)
p
e
a
k
)
-
Max
M
a
x
MEG
M
E
G
content:
c
o
n
t
e
n
t
:
3,500
3
,
5
0
0
ppmv
p
p
m
v
-
Max
M
a
x
discharge
d
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
temperature:
t
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
:
40°C
4
0
°
C
Discharge
D
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
streams
s
t
r
e
a
m
s
will
w
i
l
l
be
b
e
continuously
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
o
u
s
l
y
monitored
m
o
n
i
t
o
r
e
d
per
p
e
r
applicable
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
national
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
and
a
n
d
environmental
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
regulations.
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
8.11.3
8
.
1
1
.
3
H₂S
H
₂
S
Content
C
o
n
t
e
n
t
Reservoir
R
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
fluids
fl
u
i
d
s
are
a
r
e
expected
e
x
p
e
c
t
e
d
to
t
o
be
b
e
free
f
r
e
e
of
o
f
H₂S.
H
₂
S
.
8.11.4
8
.
1
1
.
4
CO₂
C
O
₂
Content
C
o
n
t
e
n
t
Reservoir
R
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
CO₂
C
O
₂
content
c
o
n
t
e
n
t
is
i
s
~0.92
~
0
.
9
2
mol%.
m
o
l
%
.
8.12
8
.
1
2
Field
F
i
e
l
d
Flowrates
F
l
o
w
r
a
t
e
s
for
f
o
r
Design
D
e
s
i
g
n
Basis
B
a
s
i
s
Table
T
a
b
l
e
19
1
9
summarizes
s
u
m
m
a
r
i
z
e
s
the
t
h
e
design
d
e
s
i
g
n
case
c
a
s
e
flowrates
fl
o
w
r
a
t
e
s
used
u
s
e
d
for
f
o
r
facility
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
capacity
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
verification.
v
e
r
i
fi
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
Fluid
F
l
u
i
d
Inlet
I
n
l
e
t
Gas
G
a
s
[MMSCFD]
[
M
M
S
C
F
D
]
Condensate
C
o
n
d
e
n
s
a
t
e
[Sbbl/d]
[
S
b
b
l
/
d
]
Water
W
a
t
e
r
[Sbbl/d]
[
S
b
b
l
/
d
]
HP
H
P
Mode
M
o
d
e
223.6
2
2
3
.
6
1303.5
1
3
0
3
.
5
0.68
0
.
6
8
(Table
(
T
a
b
l
e
19
1
9
–
–
Development
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Design
D
e
s
i
g
n
Cases)
C
a
s
e
s
)
granularity=word tetml={elements={line} glyphdetails={all}} contentanalysis={punctuationbreaks=false dehyphenate=false shadowdetect=false} layoutanalysis={tabledetect=0 layoutdetect=3} structureanalysis={list=true}
9.0
9
.
0
FACILITIES
F
A
C
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
9.1
9
.
1
Subsea,
S
u
b
s
e
a
,
Umbilical
U
m
b
i
l
i
c
a
l
and
a
n
d
Flowlines
F
l
o
w
l
i
n
e
s
The
T
h
e
following
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
section
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
provides
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
an
a
n
overview
o
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
of
o
f
the
t
h
e
subsea
s
u
b
s
e
a
architecture
a
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
e
for
f
o
r
PROJECT
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
ALPINE,
A
L
P
I
N
E
,
covering
c
o
v
e
r
i
n
g
subsea
s
u
b
s
e
a
production
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
hardware,
h
a
r
d
w
a
r
e
,
umbilicals,
u
m
b
i
l
i
c
a
l
s
,
subsea
s
u
b
s
e
a
control
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
systems,
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
,
and
a
n
d
flexible
fl
e
x
i
b
l
e
flowline
fl
o
w
l
i
n
e
arrangements.
a
r
r
a
n
g
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
9.1.1
9
.
1
.
1
Floating
F
l
o
a
t
i
n
g
Production
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
Unit
U
n
i
t
(FPU)
(
F
P
U
)
For
F
o
r
the
t
h
e
overall
o
v
e
r
a
l
l
process
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
description
d
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
of
o
f
the
t
h
e
Floating
F
l
o
a
t
i
n
g
Production
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
Unit,
U
n
i
t
,
refer
r
e
f
e
r
to
t
o
[22].
[
2
2
]
.
9.1.2
9
.
1
.
2
Design
D
e
s
i
g
n
Life
L
i
f
e
The
T
h
e
subsea
s
u
b
s
e
a
production
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
and
a
n
d
control
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
system
s
y
s
t
e
m
shall
s
h
a
l
l
be
b
e
designed
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
for
f
o
r
a
a
service
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
life
l
i
f
e
of
o
f
20
2
0
years.
y
e
a
r
s
.
9.1.3
9
.
1
.
3
Maximum
M
a
x
i
m
u
m
Water
W
a
t
e
r
Depth
D
e
p
t
h
All
A
l
l
subsea
s
u
b
s
e
a
equipment
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
shall
s
h
a
l
l
be
b
e
rated
r
a
t
e
d
for
f
o
r
an
a
n
installation
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
water
w
a
t
e
r
depth
d
e
p
t
h
of
o
f
1,200
1
,
2
0
0
m.
m
.
9.1.4
9
.
1
.
4
Main
M
a
i
n
Subsea
S
u
b
s
e
a
Equipment
E
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
A
A
preliminary
p
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
list
l
i
s
t
of
o
f
key
k
e
y
subsea
s
u
b
s
e
a
components
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
s
and
a
n
d
associated
a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
design
d
e
s
i
g
n
parameters
p
a
r
a
m
e
t
e
r
s
is
i
s
provided
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
below.
b
e
l
o
w
.
Table
T
a
b
l
e
20
2
0
–
–
Preliminary
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
List
L
i
s
t
of
o
f
Main
M
a
i
n
Subsea
S
u
b
s
e
a
Equipment
E
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
Item
I
t
e
m
Quantity
Q
u
a
n
t
i
t
y
Design
D
e
s
i
g
n
Pressure
P
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
Design
D
e
s
i
g
n
Temperature
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
Production
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
Xmas
X
m
a
s
2
2
10,000
1
0
,
0
0
0
psi
p
s
i
Upstream
U
p
s
t
r
e
a
m
choke:
c
h
o
k
e
:
Tree
T
r
e
e
-18
-
1
8
/
/
+121
+
1
2
1
°C
°
C
Downstream:
D
o
w
n
s
t
r
e
a
m
:
-48
-
4
8
HIPPS
H
I
P
P
S
System
S
y
s
t
e
m
1
1
(i)
(
i
)
270
2
7
0
bar
b
a
r
header
h
e
a
d
e
r
from
f
r
o
m
HBV1
H
B
V
1
to
t
o
inboard
i
n
b
o
a
r
d
connector;
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
o
r
;
header
h
e
a
d
e
r
from
f
r
o
m
TIV1
T
I
V
1
to
t
o
inboard
i
n
b
o
a
r
d
connector,
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
o
r
,
incl.
i
n
c
l
.
hot
h
o
t
stab
s
t
a
b
lines
l
i
n
e
s
(ii)
(
i
i
)
421
4
2
1
bar
b
a
r
for
f
o
r
remaining
r
e
m
a
i
n
i
n
g
header
h
e
a
d
e
r
sections,
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
,
valves
v
a
l
v
e
s
and
a
n
d
chem.
c
h
e
m
.
injection
i
n
j
e
c
t
i
o
n
lines
l
i
n
e
s
ALPINE
A
L
P
I
N
E
Manifold
M
a
n
i
f
o
l
d
Structure
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
Subsea
S
u
b
s
e
a
Hub
H
u
b
Structure
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
1
1
270
2
7
0
bar
b
a
r
for
f
o
r
header;
h
e
a
d
e
r
;
650
6
5
0
bar
b
a
r
for
f
o
r
branch
b
r
a
n
c
h
up
u
p
to
t
o
branch
b
r
a
n
c
h
valve
v
a
l
v
e
(valve
(
v
a
l
v
e
included)
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
)
1
1
520
5
2
0
bar
b
a
r
across
a
c
r
o
s
s
structure
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
except
e
x
c
e
p
t
header
h
e
a
d
e
r
connectors
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
o
r
s
(270
(
2
7
0
bar)
b
a
r
)
/
/
+121
+
1
2
1
°C
°
C
-20
-
2
0
/
/
+70
+
7
0
°C
°
C
-20
-
2
0
/
/
+70
+
7
0
°C
°
C
-29
-
2
9
/
/
+70
+
7
0
°C
°
C
granularity=word tetml={elements={line} glyphdetails={all}} contentanalysis={punctuationbreaks=false dehyphenate=false shadowdetect=false} layoutanalysis={tabledetect=0 layoutdetect=3} structureanalysis={list=true}
Umbilical
U
m
b
i
l
i
c
a
l
Termination
T
e
r
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Assembly
A
s
s
e
m
b
l
y
(UTA)
(
U
T
A
)
Flowline
F
l
o
w
l
i
n
e
End
E
n
d
Termination
T
e
r
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
(FLET)
(
F
L
E
T
)
4
4
(2
(
2
per
p
e
r
—
—
—
—
umbilical
u
m
b
i
l
i
c
a
l
system)
s
y
s
t
e
m
)
1
1
TBD
T
B
D
TBD
T
B
D
Notes:
N
o
t
e
s
:
-
Xmas
X
m
a
s
Tree
T
r
e
e
conditions
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
in
i
n
line
l
i
n
e
with
w
i
t
h
ALPINE
A
L
P
I
N
E
field
fi
e
l
d
specification.
s
p
e
c
i
fi
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
-
MEG
M
E
G
pump
p
u
m
p
design
d
e
s
i
g
n
pressure:
p
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
:
340
3
4
0
barg
b
a
r
g
(PSV
(
P
S
V
set
s
e
t
point).
p
o
i
n
t
)
.
Including
I
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
hydrostatic
h
y
d
r
o
s
t
a
t
i
c
head
h
e
a
d
at
a
t
1,200
1
,
2
0
0
m
m
=
=
~470
~
4
7
0
barg.
b
a
r
g
.
See
S
e
e
[32]
[
3
2
]
for
f
o
r
pressure
p
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
definition
d
e
fi
n
i
t
i
o
n
under
u
n
d
e
r
MEG
M
E
G
packing
p
a
c
k
i
n
g
conditions.
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
.
-
Subsea
S
u
b
s
e
a
structure
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
pressure
p
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
defined
d
e
fi
n
e
d
by
b
y
wellhead
w
e
l
l
h
e
a
d
shut-in
s
h
u
t
-
i
n
pressure
p
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
(WHSP)
(
W
H
S
P
)
×
×
1.1
1
.
1
=
=
~270
~
2
7
0
bar.
b
a
r
.
-
Design
D
e
s
i
g
n
temperature
t
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
includes
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
operating
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
maximum
m
a
x
i
m
u
m
(55
(
5
5
°C)
°
C
)
plus
p
l
u
s
contingency
c
o
n
t
i
n
g
e
n
c
y
margin
m
a
r
g
i
n
(+15
(
+
1
5
°C).
°
C
)
.
-
A
A
new
n
e
w
FLET
F
L
E
T
is
i
s
anticipated
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
for
f
o
r
connecting
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
n
g
ALPINE
A
L
P
I
N
E
Cluster
C
l
u
s
t
e
r
1
1
with
w
i
t
h
Cluster
C
l
u
s
t
e
r
3
3
through
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
a
a
new
n
e
w
interconnecting
i
n
t
e
r
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
n
g
line.
l
i
n
e
.
9.1.5
9
.
1
.
5
Umbilicals
U
m
b
i
l
i
c
a
l
s
A
A
dedicated
d
e
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
electro-hydraulic
e
l
e
c
t
r
o
-
h
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
umbilical
u
m
b
i
l
i
c
a
l
system
s
y
s
t
e
m
will
w
i
l
l
be
b
e
deployed
d
e
p
l
o
y
e
d
to
t
o
provide
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
hydraulic
h
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
power,
p
o
w
e
r
,
chemicals,
c
h
e
m
i
c
a
l
s
,
electrical
e
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
supply,
s
u
p
p
l
y
,
and
a
n
d
control
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
signals
s
i
g
n
a
l
s
to
t
o
the
t
h
e
subsea
s
u
b
s
e
a
production
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
equipment
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
[12].
[
1
2
]
.
Umbilical
U
m
b
i
l
i
c
a
l
Deployment
D
e
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
Scenario
S
c
e
n
a
r
i
o
(Cluster
(
C
l
u
s
t
e
r
1):
1
)
:
-
The
T
h
e
existing
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
Cluster
C
l
u
s
t
e
r
1
1
Main
M
a
i
n
Umbilical
U
m
b
i
l
i
c
a
l
(UMB1)
(
U
M
B
1
)
will
w
i
l
l
be
b
e
extended
e
x
t
e
n
d
e
d
to
t
o
support
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
ALPINE
A
L
P
I
N
E
subsea
s
u
b
s
e
a
facilities.
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
-
UMB1:
U
M
B
1
:
Flying
F
l
y
i
n
g
leads
l
e
a
d
s
will
w
i
l
l
connect
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
UTA-A
U
T
A
-
A
to
t
o
the
t
h
e
Cluster
C
l
u
s
t
e
r
1
1
SDU
S
D
U
and
a
n
d
to
t
o
the
t
h
e
HIPPS.
H
I
P
P
S
.
UTA-B
U
T
A
-
B
will
w
i
l
l
connect
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
to
t
o
Well
W
e
l
l
ALPINE-3B
A
L
P
I
N
E
-
3
B
and
a
n
d
to
t
o
UMB2
U
M
B
2
UTA-A.
U
T
A
-
A
.
-
UMB2:
U
M
B
2
:
Configured
C
o
n
fi
g
u
r
e
d
in
i
n
daisy-chain
d
a
i
s
y
-
c
h
a
i
n
from
f
r
o
m
UMB1.
U
M
B
1
.
UTA-B
U
T
A
-
B
will
w
i
l
l
connect
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
to
t
o
Well
W
e
l
l
ALPINE-4
A
L
P
I
N
E
-
4
via
v
i
a
flying
fl
y
i
n
g
leads.
l
e
a
d
s
.
Block
B
l
o
c
k
diagrams
d
i
a
g
r
a
m
s
and
a
n
d
detailed
d
e
t
a
i
l
e
d
layouts
l
a
y
o
u
t
s
are
a
r
e
provided
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
in
i
n
[2]
[
2
]
and
a
n
d
[31].
[
3
1
]
.
Where
W
h
e
r
e
practical,
p
r
a
c
t
i
c
a
l
,
existing
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
spare
s
p
a
r
e
umbilicals
u
m
b
i
l
i
c
a
l
s
from
f
r
o
m
previous
p
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
developments
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
will
w
i
l
l
be
b
e
utilized
u
t
i
l
i
z
e
d
to
t
o
optimize
o
p
t
i
m
i
z
e
design
d
e
s
i
g
n
and
a
n
d
reduce
r
e
d
u
c
e
customization.
c
u
s
t
o
m
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
.
For
F
o
r
ALPINE
A
L
P
I
N
E
UMB2,
U
M
B
2
,
the
t
h
e
spare
s
p
a
r
e
infield
i
n
fi
e
l
d
UM1C
U
M
1
C
from
f
r
o
m
the
t
h
e
LOCATION
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
asset
a
s
s
e
t
will
w
i
l
l
be
b
e
repurposed.
r
e
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
d
.
granularity=word tetml={elements={line} glyphdetails={all}} contentanalysis={punctuationbreaks=false dehyphenate=false shadowdetect=false} layoutanalysis={tabledetect=0 layoutdetect=3} structureanalysis={list=true}
9.1.6
9
.
1
.
6
Control
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
System
S
y
s
t
e
m
Each
E
a
c
h
Xmas
X
m
a
s
Tree
T
r
e
e
and
a
n
d
HIPPS
H
I
P
P
S
unit
u
n
i
t
will
w
i
l
l
be
b
e
operated
o
p
e
r
a
t
e
d
by
b
y
a
a
dedicated
d
e
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
Subsea
S
u
b
s
e
a
Control
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
Module
M
o
d
u
l
e
(SCM).
(
S
C
M
)
.
Flying
F
l
y
i
n
g
leads
l
e
a
d
s
will
w
i
l
l
distribute
d
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
power
p
o
w
e
r
and
a
n
d
control
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
between
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
UTAs
U
T
A
s
and
a
n
d
host
h
o
s
t
subsea
s
u
b
s
e
a
structures.
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
.
-
The
T
h
e
subsea
s
u
b
s
e
a
control
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
system
s
y
s
t
e
m
shall
s
h
a
l
l
be
b
e
fully
f
u
l
l
y
compatible
c
o
m
p
a
t
i
b
l
e
with
w
i
t
h
the
t
h
e
existing
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
ALPINE
A
L
P
I
N
E
host
h
o
s
t
system.
s
y
s
t
e
m
.
-
Design
D
e
s
i
g
n
shall
s
h
a
l
l
comply
c
o
m
p
l
y
with
w
i
t
h
COMPANY
C
O
M
P
A
N
Y
standard
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
ENG.STA.STD.18010,
E
N
G
.
S
T
A
.
S
T
D
.
1
8
0
1
0
,
with
w
i
t
h
HIPPS
H
I
P
P
S
designed
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
to
t
o
standard
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
ENG.STA.STD.28746.
E
N
G
.
S
T
A
.
S
T
D
.
2
8
7
4
6
.
-
Communications
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
will
w
i
l
l
be
b
e
via
v
i
a
COPS
C
O
P
S
(Communications
(
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
on
o
n
Power).
P
o
w
e
r
)
.
-
Hydraulic
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
system
s
y
s
t
e
m
design:
d
e
s
i
g
n
:
closed-loop
c
l
o
s
e
d
-
l
o
o
p
with
w
i
t
h
return
r
e
t
u
r
n
to
t
o
the
t
h
e
host
h
o
s
t
facility.
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
.
Topside
T
o
p
s
i
d
e
integration
i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
will
w
i
l
l
be
b
e
through
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
the
t
h
e
existing
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
ALPINE
A
L
P
I
N
E
control
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
system.
s
y
s
t
e
m
.
Hardware
H
a
r
d
w
a
r
e
modifications
m
o
d
i
fi
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
(one
(
o
n
e
channel
c
h
a
n
n
e
l
at
a
t
a
a
time)
t
i
m
e
)
may
m
a
y
be
b
e
performed
p
e
r
f
o
r
m
e
d
without
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
shutting
s
h
u
t
t
i
n
g
down
d
o
w
n
Cluster
C
l
u
s
t
e
r
1.
1
.
Software
S
o
f
t
w
a
r
e
updates,
u
p
d
a
t
e
s
,
however,
h
o
w
e
v
e
r
,
could
c
o
u
l
d
require
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
temporary
t
e
m
p
o
r
a
r
y
production
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
shutdown.
s
h
u
t
d
o
w
n
.
See
S
e
e
[30]
[
3
0
]
and
a
n
d
[31]
[
3
1
]
for
f
o
r
integration
i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
details.
d
e
t
a
i
l
s
.
9.1.7
9
.
1
.
7
Flowline
F
l
o
w
l
i
n
e
System
S
y
s
t
e
m
Flexible
F
l
e
x
i
b
l
e
pipelines
p
i
p
e
l
i
n
e
s
have
h
a
v
e
been
b
e
e
n
selected
s
e
l
e
c
t
e
d
for
f
o
r
the
t
h
e
ALPINE
A
L
P
I
N
E
development.
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
The
T
h
e
table
t
a
b
l
e
below
b
e
l
o
w
summarizes
s
u
m
m
a
r
i
z
e
s
preliminary
p
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
design
d
e
s
i
g
n
inputs
i
n
p
u
t
s
for
f
o
r
the
t
h
e
flexible
fl
e
x
i
b
l
e
pipeline
p
i
p
e
l
i
n
e
system
s
y
s
t
e
m
and
a
n
d
associated
a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
routing
r
o
u
t
i
n
g
analysis.
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
.
Table
T
a
b
l
e
21
2
1
–
–
Flexible
F
l
e
x
i
b
l
e
Pipeline
P
i
p
e
l
i
n
e
Design
D
e
s
i
g
n
Inputs
I
n
p
u
t
s
Parameter
P
a
r
a
m
e
t
e
r
Value
V
a
l
u
e
Standard
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
23020.ENG.SSE.STD
2
3
0
2
0
.
E
N
G
.
S
S
E
.
S
T
D
International
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
Codes
C
o
d
e
s
API
A
P
I
17B
1
7
B
/
/
API
A
P
I
17J
1
7
J
Flowline
F
l
o
w
l
i
n
e
1
1
&
&
2
2
ID
I
D
12”
1
2
”
(304.8
(
3
0
4
.
8
mm)
m
m
)
Flowline
F
l
o
w
l
i
n
e
3
3
ID
I
D
11.5”
1
1
.
5
”
(292
(
2
9
2
mm)*
m
m
)
*
Flexible
F
l
e
x
i
b
l
e
Jumper
J
u
m
p
e
r
ID**
I
D
*
*
12”
1
2
”
(304.8
(
3
0
4
.
8
mm)
m
m
)
Well
W
e
l
l
Jumper
J
u
m
p
e
r
ID
I
D
8”
8
”
Interconnecting
I
n
t
e
r
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
n
g
Flowline
F
l
o
w
l
i
n
e
ID
I
D
8”
8
”
Design
D
e
s
i
g
n
Temperature
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
70
7
0
°C
°
C
Design
D
e
s
i
g
n
Pressure
P
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
Flowline
F
l
o
w
l
i
n
e
1
1
&
&
2
2
270
2
7
0
bar
b
a
r
Design
D
e
s
i
g
n
Pressure
P
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
Flowline
F
l
o
w
l
i
n
e
3*
3
*
520
5
2
0
bar
b
a
r
Design
D
e
s
i
g
n
Pressure
P
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
Interconnecting
I
n
t
e
r
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
n
g
Line
L
i
n
e
205
2
0
5
bar
b
a
r
Design
D
e
s
i
g
n
Pressure
P
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
Flexible
F
l
e
x
i
b
l
e
Jumper**
J
u
m
p
e
r
*
*
205
2
0
5
bar
b
a
r
Water
W
a
t
e
r
Depth
D
e
p
t
h
1,200
1
,
2
0
0
m
m
*
*
Flowline
F
l
o
w
l
i
n
e
3
3
will
w
i
l
l
reuse
r
e
u
s
e
spare
s
p
a
r
e
11.5”
1
1
.
5
”
flexible
fl
e
x
i
b
l
e
pipe
p
i
p
e
from
f
r
o
m
prior
p
r
i
o
r
project
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
inventory.
i
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
.
**
*
*
Jumper
J
u
m
p
e
r
required
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
to
t
o
connect
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
the
t
h
e
existing
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
Cluster
C
l
u
s
t
e
r
1
1
manifold
m
a
n
i
f
o
l
d
to
t
o
the
t
h
e
new
n
e
w
FLET.
F
L
E
T
.
granularity=word tetml={elements={line} glyphdetails={all}} contentanalysis={punctuationbreaks=false dehyphenate=false shadowdetect=false} layoutanalysis={tabledetect=0 layoutdetect=3} structureanalysis={list=true}
Flexible
F
l
e
x
i
b
l
e
Well
W
e
l
l
Jumpers:
J
u
m
p
e
r
s
:
-
Design
D
e
s
i
g
n
Pressure:
P
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
:
520
5
2
0
bar
b
a
r
-
Design
D
e
s
i
g
n
Temperature:
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
:
70
7
0
°C
°
C
-
Length
L
e
n
g
t
h
/
/
Quantity:
Q
u
a
n
t
i
t
y
:
~90
~
9
0
m
m
/
/
2
2
units
u
n
i
t
s
Flexible
F
l
e
x
i
b
l
e
solutions
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
s
were
w
e
r
e
confirmed
c
o
n
fi
r
m
e
d
during
d
u
r
i
n
g
concept
c
o
n
c
e
p
t
selection
s
e
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
for
f
o
r
suitability
s
u
i
t
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
under
u
n
d
e
r
mechanical,
m
e
c
h
a
n
i
c
a
l
,
operational,
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
,
and
a
n
d
environmental
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
conditions
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
at
a
t
1,200
1
,
2
0
0
m
m
water
w
a
t
e
r
depth.
d
e
p
t
h
.
Rigid
R
i
g
i
d
alternatives
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
were
w
e
r
e
evaluated
e
v
a
l
u
a
t
e
d
but
b
u
t
flexible
fl
e
x
i
b
l
e
lines
l
i
n
e
s
were
w
e
r
e
selected
s
e
l
e
c
t
e
d
due
d
u
e
to
t
o
advantages
a
d
v
a
n
t
a
g
e
s
in
i
n
cost,
c
o
s
t
,
schedule,
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
,
and
a
n
d
install
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
ability.
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
.
10.0
1
0
.
0
HEALTH,
H
E
A
L
T
H
,
SAFETY,
S
A
F
E
T
Y
,
AND
A
N
D
ENVIRONMENT
E
N
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
(HSE)
(
H
S
E
)
The
T
h
e
Project
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
shall
s
h
a
l
l
be
b
e
developed
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
in
i
n
alignment
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
with
w
i
t
h
applicable
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
national
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
regulations
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
and
a
n
d
corporate
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
HSE
H
S
E
requirements,
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
,
taking
t
a
k
i
n
g
into
i
n
t
o
account
a
c
c
o
u
n
t
international
i
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
standards
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
such
s
u
c
h
as:
a
s
:
-
ISO
I
S
O
14001
1
4
0
0
1
(Environmental
(
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
Management
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
Systems)
S
y
s
t
e
m
s
)
-
ISO
I
S
O
45001
4
5
0
0
1
(Occupational
(
O
c
c
u
p
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
Health
H
e
a
l
t
h
and
a
n
d
Safety
S
a
f
e
t
y
Management
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
Systems)
S
y
s
t
e
m
s
)
-
OHSAS
O
H
S
A
S
18001
1
8
0
0
1
(Occupational
(
O
c
c
u
p
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
Health
H
e
a
l
t
h
and
a
n
d
Safety)
S
a
f
e
t
y
)
Corporate
C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
HSE
H
S
E
policies
p
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
and
a
n
d
internal
i
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
standards
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
are
a
r
e
used
u
s
e
d
as
a
s
the
t
h
e
basis
b
a
s
i
s
for
f
o
r
defining
d
e
fi
n
i
n
g
the
t
h
e
project
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
HSE
H
S
E
requirements.
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
Preliminary
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
HSE
H
S
E
Philosophy
P
h
i
l
o
s
o
p
h
y
has
h
a
s
been
b
e
e
n
prepared
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
for
f
o
r
the
t
h
e
Concept
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
Definition
D
e
fi
n
i
t
i
o
n
Phase,
P
h
a
s
e
,
with
w
i
t
h
the
t
h
e
aim
a
i
m
of
o
f
ensuring
e
n
s
u
r
i
n
g
an
a
n
inherently
i
n
h
e
r
e
n
t
l
y
safe
s
a
f
e
design
d
e
s
i
g
n
that:
t
h
a
t
:
-
Minimises
M
i
n
i
m
i
s
e
s
the
t
h
e
likelihood
l
i
k
e
l
i
h
o
o
d
of
o
f
hazardous
h
a
z
a
r
d
o
u
s
events.
e
v
e
n
t
s
.
-
Reduces
R
e
d
u
c
e
s
the
t
h
e
potential
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
consequences
c
o
n
s
e
q
u
e
n
c
e
s
of
o
f
accidental
a
c
c
i
d
e
n
t
a
l
events.
e
v
e
n
t
s
.
-
Ensures
E
n
s
u
r
e
s
a
a
safe
s
a
f
e
working
w
o
r
k
i
n
g
environment
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
for
f
o
r
all
a
l
l
personnel.
p
e
r
s
o
n
n
e
l
.
-
Provides
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
adequate
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
escape
e
s
c
a
p
e
and
a
n
d
rescue
r
e
s
c
u
e
provisions
p
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
in
i
n
emergencies.
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
i
e
s
.
-
Includes
I
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
sufficient
s
u
ff
i
c
i
e
n
t
protective
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
v
e
systems
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
and
a
n
d
redundancy
r
e
d
u
n
d
a
n
c
y
to
t
o
detect,
d
e
t
e
c
t
,
isolate,
i
s
o
l
a
t
e
,
and
a
n
d
control
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
accidental
a
c
c
i
d
e
n
t
a
l
releases
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
s
of
o
f
flammable
fl
a
m
m
a
b
l
e
or
o
r
toxic
t
o
x
i
c
substances.
s
u
b
s
t
a
n
c
e
s
.
-
Ensures
E
n
s
u
r
e
s
effective
e
ff
e
c
t
i
v
e
fire
fi
r
e
detection,
d
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
,
control,
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
,
and
a
n
d
extinguishing
e
x
t
i
n
g
u
i
s
h
i
n
g
systems.
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
.
-
Minimises
M
i
n
i
m
i
s
e
s
potential
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
environmental
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
pollution.
p
o
l
l
u
t
i
o
n
.
HSE
H
S
E
development
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
will
w
i
l
l
be
b
e
supported
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
e
d
by
b
y
a
a
formal
f
o
r
m
a
l
risk-based
r
i
s
k
-
b
a
s
e
d
assessment
a
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
process
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
(e.g.
(
e
.
g
.
HAZID,
H
A
Z
I
D
,
HAZOP,
H
A
Z
O
P
,
ESHIA,
E
S
H
I
A
,
and
a
n
d
other
o
t
h
e
r
safety
s
a
f
e
t
y
studies).
s
t
u
d
i
e
s
)
.
The
T
h
e
goal
g
o
a
l
is
i
s
to
t
o
identify
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
y
hazards,
h
a
z
a
r
d
s
,
evaluate
e
v
a
l
u
a
t
e
risks,
r
i
s
k
s
,
and
a
n
d
implement
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
effective
e
ff
e
c
t
i
v
e
mitigation
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
and
a
n
d
control
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
measures.
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
.
granularity=word tetml={elements={line} glyphdetails={all}} contentanalysis={punctuationbreaks=false dehyphenate=false shadowdetect=false} layoutanalysis={tabledetect=0 layoutdetect=3} structureanalysis={list=true}
10.1
1
0
.
1
Safety
S
a
f
e
t
y
Criteria
C
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
The
T
h
e
objectives
o
b
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
s
of
o
f
the
t
h
e
Safety
S
a
f
e
t
y
Criteria
C
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
are
a
r
e
to:
t
o
:
-
Minimise
M
i
n
i
m
i
s
e
the
t
h
e
likelihood
l
i
k
e
l
i
h
o
o
d
and
a
n
d
consequences
c
o
n
s
e
q
u
e
n
c
e
s
of
o
f
accidental
a
c
c
i
d
e
n
t
a
l
events.
e
v
e
n
t
s
.
-
Reduce
R
e
d
u
c
e
the
t
h
e
potential
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
for
f
o
r
hazardous
h
a
z
a
r
d
o
u
s
occurrences.
o
c
c
u
r
r
e
n
c
e
s
.
-
Maximise
M
a
x
i
m
i
s
e
the
t
h
e
effectiveness
e
ff
e
c
t
i
v
e
n
e
s
s
of
o
f
protective
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
v
e
measures.
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
.
-
Provide
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
redundancy
r
e
d
u
n
d
a
n
c
y
and
a
n
d
safety
s
a
f
e
t
y
devices
d
e
v
i
c
e
s
to
t
o
contain
c
o
n
t
a
i
n
uncontrolled
u
n
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
l
e
d
releases.
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
s
.
-
Implement
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
fire
fi
r
e
protection
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
systems
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
capable
c
a
p
a
b
l
e
of
o
f
controlling
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
l
i
n
g
foreseeable
f
o
r
e
s
e
e
a
b
l
e
fire
fi
r
e
scenarios.
s
c
e
n
a
r
i
o
s
.
-
Ensure
E
n
s
u
r
e
safe
s
a
f
e
escape
e
s
c
a
p
e
and
a
n
d
rescue
r
e
s
c
u
e
from
f
r
o
m
all
a
l
l
areas.
a
r
e
a
s
.
-
Limit
L
i
m
i
t
environmental
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
pollution
p
o
l
l
u
t
i
o
n
from
f
r
o
m
accidental
a
c
c
i
d
e
n
t
a
l
releases
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
s
(spills,
(
s
p
i
l
l
s
,
flaring,
fl
a
r
i
n
g
,
venting).
v
e
n
t
i
n
g
)
.
-
Reduce
R
e
d
u
c
e
construction-phase
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
-
p
h
a
s
e
risks,
r
i
s
k
s
,
including
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
work
w
o
r
k
in
i
n
brownfield
b
r
o
w
n
fi
e
l
d
areas.
a
r
e
a
s
.
The
T
h
e
overall
o
v
e
r
a
l
l
design
d
e
s
i
g
n
approach
a
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
shall
s
h
a
l
l
aim
a
i
m
to
t
o
eliminate
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
t
e
intolerable
i
n
t
o
l
e
r
a
b
l
e
risks
r
i
s
k
s
and
a
n
d
reduce
r
e
d
u
c
e
tolerable
t
o
l
e
r
a
b
l
e
risks
r
i
s
k
s
to
t
o
a
a
level
l
e
v
e
l
that
t
h
a
t
is
i
s
demonstrably
d
e
m
o
n
s
t
r
a
b
l
y
ALARP
A
L
A
R
P
(As
(
A
s
Low
L
o
w
As
A
s
Reasonably
R
e
a
s
o
n
a
b
l
y
Practicable),
P
r
a
c
t
i
c
a
b
l
e
)
,
through:
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
:
-
Sound
S
o
u
n
d
decision-making
d
e
c
i
s
i
o
n
-
m
a
k
i
n
g
based
b
a
s
e
d
on
o
n
safety
s
a
f
e
t
y
considerations.
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
-
Containment
C
o
n
t
a
i
n
m
e
n
t
of
o
f
hydrocarbons
h
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
s
and
a
n
d
prevention
p
r
e
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
of
o
f
ignition.
i
g
n
i
t
i
o
n
.
-
Reduction
R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
of
o
f
ignition
i
g
n
i
t
i
o
n
likelihood.
l
i
k
e
l
i
h
o
o
d
.
-
Fire
F
i
r
e
and
a
n
d
gas
g
a
s
detection
d
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
and
a
n
d
prevention
p
r
e
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
of
o
f
escalation.
e
s
c
a
l
a
t
i
o
n
.
-
Ensuring
E
n
s
u
r
i
n
g
personnel
p
e
r
s
o
n
n
e
l
protection
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
and
a
n
d
evacuation
e
v
a
c
u
a
t
i
o
n
provisions.
p
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
.
10.2
1
0
.
2
Health
H
e
a
l
t
h
Considerations
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
The
T
h
e
Project
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
shall
s
h
a
l
l
comply
c
o
m
p
l
y
with
w
i
t
h
all
a
l
l
health
h
e
a
l
t
h
and
a
n
d
regulatory
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
o
r
y
requirements,
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
,
ensuring
e
n
s
u
r
i
n
g
that
t
h
a
t
the
t
h
e
health
h
e
a
l
t
h
of
o
f
employees
e
m
p
l
o
y
e
e
s
and
a
n
d
contractors
c
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r
s
is
i
s
protected
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
e
d
during
d
u
r
i
n
g
design,
d
e
s
i
g
n
,
construction,
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
,
commissioning,
c
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
i
n
g
,
and
a
n
d
operations.
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
The
T
h
e
health
h
e
a
l
t
h
risk-based
r
i
s
k
-
b
a
s
e
d
approach
a
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
will
w
i
l
l
include:
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
:
-
Identification
I
d
e
n
t
i
fi
c
a
t
i
o
n
and
a
n
d
evaluation
e
v
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
of
o
f
occupational
o
c
c
u
p
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
and
a
n
d
community
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
health
h
e
a
l
t
h
risks
r
i
s
k
s
(e.g.,
(
e
.
g
.
,
exposure,
e
x
p
o
s
u
r
e
,
infectious
i
n
f
e
c
t
i
o
u
s
disease,
d
i
s
e
a
s
e
,
accommodations,
a
c
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
water,
w
a
t
e
r
,
food,
f
o
o
d
,
vector-borne
v
e
c
t
o
r
-
b
o
r
n
e
illness,
i
l
l
n
e
s
s
,
medical
m
e
d
i
c
a
l
support).
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
)
.
-
Implementation
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
of
o
f
risk
r
i
s
k
mitigation
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
measures.
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
.
-
Communication
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
of
o
f
health
h
e
a
l
t
h
risk
r
i
s
k
information.
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
.
-
Medical
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
fitness-for-duty
fi
t
n
e
s
s
-
f
o
r
-
d
u
t
y
programs.
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
.
granularity=word tetml={elements={line} glyphdetails={all}} contentanalysis={punctuationbreaks=false dehyphenate=false shadowdetect=false} layoutanalysis={tabledetect=0 layoutdetect=3} structureanalysis={list=true}
-
Health
H
e
a
l
t
h
assessments
a
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
s
for
f
o
r
potentially
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
l
y
exposed
e
x
p
o
s
e
d
workers.
w
o
r
k
e
r
s
.
-
Regular
R
e
g
u
l
a
r
inspections
i
n
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
and
a
n
d
monitoring,
m
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
,
including
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
industrial
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
hygiene
h
y
g
i
e
n
e
programs.
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
.
Additional
A
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
health-related
h
e
a
l
t
h
-
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
design
d
e
s
i
g
n
considerations
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
include:
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
:
-
Facility
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
noise
n
o
i
s
e
level
l
e
v
e
l
design
d
e
s
i
g
n
criteria.
c
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
.
-
Medevac
M
e
d
e
v
a
c
arrangements.
a
r
r
a
n
g
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
-
Emergency
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
shower
s
h
o
w
e
r
and
a
n
d
eyewash
e
y
e
w
a
s
h
stations.
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
-
Safe
S
a
f
e
design
d
e
s
i
g
n
for
f
o
r
hazardous
h
a
z
a
r
d
o
u
s
material
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
storage
s
t
o
r
a
g
e
and
a
n
d
handling.
h
a
n
d
l
i
n
g
.
10.3
1
0
.
3
SIMOPS
S
I
M
O
P
S
(Simultaneous
(
S
i
m
u
l
t
a
n
e
o
u
s
Operations)
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
)
SIMOPS
S
I
M
O
P
S
refers
r
e
f
e
r
s
to
t
o
conducting
c
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
n
g
multiple
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e
activities
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
concurrently
c
o
n
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
(e.g.,
(
e
.
g
.
,
hydrocarbon
h
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
production
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
alongside
a
l
o
n
g
s
i
d
e
drilling,
d
r
i
l
l
i
n
g
,
construction,
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
,
commissioning,
c
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
i
n
g
,
or
o
r
maintenance).
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
)
.
While
W
h
i
l
e
SIMOPS
S
I
M
O
P
S
allow
a
l
l
o
w
production
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
continuity
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
i
t
y
and
a
n
d
reduce
r
e
d
u
c
e
downtime,
d
o
w
n
t
i
m
e
,
they
t
h
e
y
introduce
i
n
t
r
o
d
u
c
e
additional
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
operational
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
complexity
c
o
m
p
l
e
x
i
t
y
and
a
n
d
risk,
r
i
s
k
,
including:
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
:
-
Higher
H
i
g
h
e
r
probability
p
r
o
b
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
of
o
f
hazards
h
a
z
a
r
d
s
due
d
u
e
to
t
o
concurrent
c
o
n
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
activities.
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
.
-
Increased
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
ignition
i
g
n
i
t
i
o
n
risks
r
i
s
k
s
from
f
r
o
m
hot
h
o
t
work
w
o
r
k
(e.g.,
(
e
.
g
.
,
welding,
w
e
l
d
i
n
g
,
cutting)
c
u
t
t
i
n
g
)
in
i
n
areas
a
r
e
a
s
near
n
e
a
r
hydrocarbon
h
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
systems.
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
.
Effective
E
ff
e
c
t
i
v
e
planning
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
and
a
n
d
control
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
are
a
r
e
required
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
to
t
o
manage
m
a
n
a
g
e
SIMOPS
S
I
M
O
P
S
risks
r
i
s
k
s
while
w
h
i
l
e
maintaining
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
production.
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
.
10.4
1
0
.
4
Risk
R
i
s
k
Identification
I
d
e
n
t
i
fi
c
a
t
i
o
n
During
D
u
r
i
n
g
the
t
h
e
current
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
Project
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
Phase,
P
h
a
s
e
,
the
t
h
e
following
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
structured
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
d
studies
s
t
u
d
i
e
s
will
w
i
l
l
be
b
e
performed:
p
e
r
f
o
r
m
e
d
:
-
HAZID
H
A
Z
I
D
(Hazard
(
H
a
z
a
r
d
Identification):
I
d
e
n
t
i
fi
c
a
t
i
o
n
)
:
Systematic
S
y
s
t
e
m
a
t
i
c
early-stage
e
a
r
l
y
-
s
t
a
g
e
review
r
e
v
i
e
w
of
o
f
potential
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
external
e
x
t
e
r
n
a
l
threats
t
h
r
e
a
t
s
with
w
i
t
h
the
t
h
e
potential
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
to
t
o
create
c
r
e
a
t
e
health,
h
e
a
l
t
h
,
safety,
s
a
f
e
t
y
,
environmental,
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
,
asset,
a
s
s
e
t
,
or
o
r
reputational
r
e
p
u
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
risks.
r
i
s
k
s
.
-
HAZOP
H
A
Z
O
P
(Hazard
(
H
a
z
a
r
d
and
a
n
d
Operability):
O
p
e
r
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
)
:
Detailed
D
e
t
a
i
l
e
d
review
r
e
v
i
e
w
of
o
f
design
d
e
s
i
g
n
and
a
n
d
operations
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
for
f
o
r
new
n
e
w
or
o
r
modified
m
o
d
i
fi
e
d
process/utility
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
/
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
systems,
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
,
ensuring
e
n
s
u
r
i
n
g
compliance
c
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
with
w
i
t
h
safety
s
a
f
e
t
y
and
a
n
d
operational
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
standards.
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
.
The
T
h
e
purpose
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
of
o
f
these
t
h
e
s
e
assessments
a
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
s
is
i
s
to
t
o
identify
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
y
risks
r
i
s
k
s
early
e
a
r
l
y
and
a
n
d
define
d
e
fi
n
e
mitigation
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
actions.
a
c
t
i
o
n
s
.
granularity=word tetml={elements={line} glyphdetails={all}} contentanalysis={punctuationbreaks=false dehyphenate=false shadowdetect=false} layoutanalysis={tabledetect=0 layoutdetect=3} structureanalysis={list=true}
Table
T
a
b
l
e
21:
2
1
:
Example
E
x
a
m
p
l
e
of
o
f
Qualitative
Q
u
a
l
i
t
a
t
i
v
e
Risk
R
i
s
k
Matrix
M
a
t
r
i
x
Consequence
C
o
n
s
e
q
u
e
n
c
e
\
\
Likelihood
L
i
k
e
l
i
h
o
o
d
Rare
R
a
r
e
Unlikely
U
n
l
i
k
e
l
y
Possible
P
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
Likely
L
i
k
e
l
y
Almost
A
l
m
o
s
t
Certain
C
e
r
t
a
i
n
Insignificant
I
n
s
i
g
n
i
fi
c
a
n
t
Low
L
o
w
Low
L
o
w
Low
L
o
w
Medium
M
e
d
i
u
m
Medium
M
e
d
i
u
m
Minor
M
i
n
o
r
Low
L
o
w
Low
L
o
w
Medium
M
e
d
i
u
m
Medium
M
e
d
i
u
m
High
H
i
g
h
Moderate
M
o
d
e
r
a
t
e
Low
L
o
w
Medium
M
e
d
i
u
m
Medium
M
e
d
i
u
m
High
H
i
g
h
High
H
i
g
h
Major
M
a
j
o
r
Medium
M
e
d
i
u
m
Medium
M
e
d
i
u
m
High
H
i
g
h
High
H
i
g
h
Extreme
E
x
t
r
e
m
e
Catastrophic
C
a
t
a
s
t
r
o
p
h
i
c
Medium
M
e
d
i
u
m
High
H
i
g
h
High
H
i
g
h
Extreme
E
x
t
r
e
m
e
Extreme
E
x
t
r
e
m
e
Note:
N
o
t
e
:
This
T
h
i
s
qualitative
q
u
a
l
i
t
a
t
i
v
e
risk
r
i
s
k
ranking
r
a
n
k
i
n
g
is
i
s
subject
s
u
b
j
e
c
t
to
t
o
project-specific
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
-
s
p
e
c
i
fi
c
calibration.
c
a
l
i
b
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
All
A
l
l
recommendations
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
raised
r
a
i
s
e
d
during
d
u
r
i
n
g
the
t
h
e
studies
s
t
u
d
i
e
s
shall
s
h
a
l
l
be
b
e
tracked,
t
r
a
c
k
e
d
,
assigned,
a
s
s
i
g
n
e
d
,
and
a
n
d
closed
c
l
o
s
e
d
prior
p
r
i
o
r
to
t
o
completion
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
of
o
f
the
t
h
e
Project
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
Phase.
P
h
a
s
e
.
10.5
1
0
.
5
Environmental,
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
,
Social
S
o
c
i
a
l
and
a
n
d
Health
H
e
a
l
t
h
Impact
I
m
p
a
c
t
Assessment
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
(ESHIA)
(
E
S
H
I
A
)
An
A
n
ESHIA
E
S
H
I
A
has
h
a
s
been
b
e
e
n
developed
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
during
d
u
r
i
n
g
the
t
h
e
FEED
F
E
E
D
phase.
p
h
a
s
e
.
The
T
h
e
results
r
e
s
u
l
t
s
of
o
f
the
t
h
e
study
s
t
u
d
y
will
w
i
l
l
be
b
e
provided
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
to
t
o
the
t
h
e
Contractor
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r
for
f
o
r
incorporation
i
n
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
into
i
n
t
o
detailed
d
e
t
a
i
l
e
d
design.
d
e
s
i
g
n
.
11.0
1
1
.
0
Greenhouse
G
r
e
e
n
h
o
u
s
e
Gas
G
a
s
(GHG)
(
G
H
G
)
Emissions
E
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
s
and
a
n
d
Climate
C
l
i
m
a
t
e
Change
C
h
a
n
g
e
Mitigation
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
The
T
h
e
Project
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
is
i
s
committed
c
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
d
to
t
o
reducing
r
e
d
u
c
i
n
g
greenhouse
g
r
e
e
n
h
o
u
s
e
gas
g
a
s
(GHG)
(
G
H
G
)
emissions
e
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
s
throughout
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
all
a
l
l
phases
p
h
a
s
e
s
of
o
f
development
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
and
a
n
d
operation.
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
Emission
E
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
reduction
r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
will
w
i
l
l
be
b
e
achieved
a
c
h
i
e
v
e
d
through
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
the
t
h
e
adoption
a
d
o
p
t
i
o
n
of
o
f
appropriate
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
technologies,
t
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
i
e
s
,
optimization
o
p
t
i
m
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
of
o
f
energy
e
n
e
r
g
y
consumption,
c
o
n
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
,
and
a
n
d
application
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
of
o
f
best
b
e
s
t
industry
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
y
practices
p
r
a
c
t
i
c
e
s
across
a
c
r
o
s
s
the
t
h
e
asset
a
s
s
e
t
lifecycle.
l
i
f
e
c
y
c
l
e
.
General
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
Requirements
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
Requirement
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
Description
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Flaring
F
l
a
r
i
n
g
Routine
R
o
u
t
i
n
e
flaring
fl
a
r
i
n
g
is
i
s
not
n
o
t
permitted
p
e
r
m
i
t
t
e
d
at
a
t
any
a
n
y
stage.
s
t
a
g
e
.
Non-routine
N
o
n
-
r
o
u
t
i
n
e
flaring
fl
a
r
i
n
g
shall
s
h
a
l
l
be
b
e
strictly
s
t
r
i
c
t
l
y
minimized.
m
i
n
i
m
i
z
e
d
.
Venting
V
e
n
t
i
n
g
Continuous
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
o
u
s
venting
v
e
n
t
i
n
g
of
o
f
CO₂
C
O
₂
or
o
r
methane
m
e
t
h
a
n
e
is
i
s
not
n
o
t
allowed
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
under
u
n
d
e
r
normal
n
o
r
m
a
l
operating
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
conditions.
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
.
Gas
G
a
s
Metering
M
e
t
e
r
i
n
g
Metering
M
e
t
e
r
i
n
g
systems
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
shall
s
h
a
l
l
be
b
e
installed
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
e
d
for
f
o
r
all
a
l
l
gas
g
a
s
streams.
s
t
r
e
a
m
s
.
Stationary
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
r
y
Combustion
C
o
m
b
u
s
t
i
o
n
Emissions
E
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
s
from
f
r
o
m
stationary
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
r
y
sources
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
shall
s
h
a
l
l
be
b
e
minimized
m
i
n
i
m
i
z
e
d
by
b
y
prioritizing:
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
z
i
n
g
:
(i)
(
i
)
low
l
o
w
energy
e
n
e
r
g
y
intensity
i
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
processes,
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
e
s
,
(ii)
(
i
i
)
high-efficiency
h
i
g
h
-
e
ff
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
fuel-gas-based
f
u
e
l
-
g
a
s
-
b
a
s
e
d
power
p
o
w
e
r
generation,
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
,
or
o
r
(iii)
(
i
i
i
)
connection
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
to
t
o
local
l
o
c
a
l
grid,
g
r
i
d
,
where
w
h
e
r
e
feasible.
f
e
a
s
i
b
l
e
.
11.1
1
1
.
1
Water
W
a
t
e
r
Management
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
Water
W
a
t
e
r
management
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
is
i
s
a
a
core
c
o
r
e
element
e
l
e
m
e
n
t
of
o
f
environmental
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
protection.
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
The
T
h
e
following
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
design
d
e
s
i
g
n
and
a
n
d
operational
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
requirements
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
apply:
a
p
p
l
y
:
granularity=word tetml={elements={line} glyphdetails={all}} contentanalysis={punctuationbreaks=false dehyphenate=false shadowdetect=false} layoutanalysis={tabledetect=0 layoutdetect=3} structureanalysis={list=true}
Requirement
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
Description
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Water
W
a
t
e
r
Use
U
s
e
Water
W
a
t
e
r
use
u
s
e
shall
s
h
a
l
l
be
b
e
minimized;
m
i
n
i
m
i
z
e
d
;
re-use
r
e
-
u
s
e
is
i
s
preferred
p
r
e
f
e
r
r
e
d
over
o
v
e
r
recycling;
r
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
;
Reduction
R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
recycling
r
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
is
i
s
preferred
p
r
e
f
e
r
r
e
d
over
o
v
e
r
discharge.
d
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
.
Flow
F
l
o
w
Flow
F
l
o
w
meters
m
e
t
e
r
s
shall
s
h
a
l
l
be
b
e
installed
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
e
d
on
o
n
all
a
l
l
intake
i
n
t
a
k
e
and
a
n
d
discharge
d
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
streams.
s
t
r
e
a
m
s
.
Measurement
M
e
a
s
u
r
e
m
e
n
t
Water
W
a
t
e
r
Discharge
D
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
Any
A
n
y
water
w
a
t
e
r
contaminated
c
o
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
t
e
d
with
w
i
t
h
hydrocarbons,
h
y
d
r
o
c
a
r
b
o
n
s
,
chemicals,
c
h
e
m
i
c
a
l
s
,
or
o
r
other
o
t
h
e
r
pollutants
p
o
l
l
u
t
a
n
t
s
must
m
u
s
t
be
b
e
routed
r
o
u
t
e
d
to
t
o
treatment
t
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
facilities
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
before
b
e
f
o
r
e
final
fi
n
a
l
disposal.
d
i
s
p
o
s
a
l
.
12.0
1
2
.
0
Regularity
R
e
g
u
l
a
r
i
t
y
and
a
n
d
Operations
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
The
T
h
e
Project’s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
’
s
operational
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
strategy
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
aims
a
i
m
s
to
t
o
ensure
e
n
s
u
r
e
continuous
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
o
u
s
and
a
n
d
reliable
r
e
l
i
a
b
l
e
production
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
while
w
h
i
l
e
prioritizing
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
z
i
n
g
safety,
s
a
f
e
t
y
,
cost
c
o
s
t
efficiency,
e
ff
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
,
and
a
n
d
environmental
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
protection.
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
Key
K
e
y
objectives
o
b
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
s
include:
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
:
-
Uninterrupted
U
n
i
n
t
e
r
r
u
p
t
e
d
production
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
operations.
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
-
Safe
S
a
f
e
and
a
n
d
ergonomic
e
r
g
o
n
o
m
i
c
facility
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
design.
d
e
s
i
g
n
.
-
Optimization
O
p
t
i
m
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
of
o
f
operational
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
lifecycle
l
i
f
e
c
y
c
l
e
costs.
c
o
s
t
s
.
-
Protection
P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
of
o
f
asset
a
s
s
e
t
integrity.
i
n
t
e
g
r
i
t
y
.
-
Reduction
R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
of
o
f
accident
a
c
c
i
d
e
n
t
risks
r
i
s
k
s
and
a
n
d
worker
w
o
r
k
e
r
exposure.
e
x
p
o
s
u
r
e
.
Compliance
C
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
will
w
i
l
l
be
b
e
ensured
e
n
s
u
r
e
d
through
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
management
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
systems
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
aligned
a
l
i
g
n
e
d
with
w
i
t
h
international
i
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
standards,
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
,
industry
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
y
best
b
e
s
t
practices,
p
r
a
c
t
i
c
e
s
,
and
a
n
d
applicable
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
national
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
regulations.
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
Asset
A
s
s
e
t
lifecycle
l
i
f
e
c
y
c
l
e
processes
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
e
s
will
w
i
l
l
be
b
e
governed
g
o
v
e
r
n
e
d
under
u
n
d
e
r
the
t
h
e
Development
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Management
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
System
S
y
s
t
e
m
(DMS)
(
D
M
S
)
and
a
n
d
the
t
h
e
Operations
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
Management
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
System
S
y
s
t
e
m
(OMS).
(
O
M
S
)
.
Operational
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
Staffing
S
t
a
ff
i
n
g
Facility
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
Manning
M
a
n
n
i
n
g
Strategy
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
Floating
F
l
o
a
t
i
n
g
Permanently
P
e
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
l
y
manned
m
a
n
n
e
d
with
w
i
t
h
rotating
r
o
t
a
t
i
n
g
shifts.
s
h
i
f
t
s
.
Accommodation
A
c
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
i
o
n
Production
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
Unit
U
n
i
t
facilities
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
shall
s
h
a
l
l
include
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
living
l
i
v
i
n
g
quarters,
q
u
a
r
t
e
r
s
,
recreational
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
areas,
a
r
e
a
s
,
first
fi
r
s
t
aid,
a
i
d
,
(FPU)
(
F
P
U
)
and
a
n
d
helideck.
h
e
l
i
d
e
c
k
.
Onshore
O
n
s
h
o
r
e
Facilities
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Designed
D
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
for
f
o
r
unattended
u
n
a
t
t
e
n
d
e
d
or
o
r
periodically
p
e
r
i
o
d
i
c
a
l
l
y
manned
m
a
n
n
e
d
operations.
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
Staffing
S
t
a
ff
i
n
g
Principles
P
r
i
n
c
i
p
l
e
s
-
Leverage
L
e
v
e
r
a
g
e
support
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
infrastructure
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
to
t
o
optimize
o
p
t
i
m
i
z
e
staffing
s
t
a
ff
i
n
g
levels.
l
e
v
e
l
s
.
-
Ensure
E
n
s
u
r
e
high
h
i
g
h
levels
l
e
v
e
l
s
of
o
f
competence
c
o
m
p
e
t
e
n
c
e
across
a
c
r
o
s
s
operational
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
teams.
t
e
a
m
s
.
-
Adopt
A
d
o
p
t
empowerment
e
m
p
o
w
e
r
m
e
n
t
approaches
a
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
e
s
for
f
o
r
efficient
e
ff
i
c
i
e
n
t
work
w
o
r
k
execution.
e
x
e
c
u
t
i
o
n
.
granularity=word tetml={elements={line} glyphdetails={all}} contentanalysis={punctuationbreaks=false dehyphenate=false shadowdetect=false} layoutanalysis={tabledetect=0 layoutdetect=3} structureanalysis={list=true}
-
Implement
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
continuous
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
o
u
s
competence
c
o
m
p
e
t
e
n
c
e
development
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
and
a
n
d
assurance.
a
s
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
.
-
Utilize
U
t
i
l
i
z
e
contracting
c
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
i
n
g
plans
p
l
a
n
s
to
t
o
supplement
s
u
p
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
workforce
w
o
r
k
f
o
r
c
e
with
w
i
t
h
specialized
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
i
z
e
d
expertise.
e
x
p
e
r
t
i
s
e
.
-
Align
A
l
i
g
n
workforce
w
o
r
k
f
o
r
c
e
planning
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
with
w
i
t
h
local
l
o
c
a
l
content
c
o
n
t
e
n
t
requirements.
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
13.0
1
3
.
0
SIMOPS
S
I
M
O
P
S
and
a
n
d
CONOPS
C
O
N
O
P
S
Requirements
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
This
T
h
i
s
section
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
outlines
o
u
t
l
i
n
e
s
requirements
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
for
f
o
r
Simultaneous
S
i
m
u
l
t
a
n
e
o
u
s
Operations
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
(SIMOPS)
(
S
I
M
O
P
S
)
and
a
n
d
Concurrent
C
o
n
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
Operations
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
(CONOPS)
(
C
O
N
O
P
S
)
in
i
n
relation
r
e
l
a
t
i
o
n
to
t
o
new
n
e
w
project
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
developments
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
near
n
e
a
r
existing
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
or
o
r
operating
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
facilities.
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
SIMOPS
S
I
M
O
P
S
During
D
u
r
i
n
g
installation
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
and
a
n
d
commissioning,
c
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
i
n
g
,
the
t
h
e
following
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
activities
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
may
m
a
y
be
b
e
conducted
c
o
n
d
u
c
t
e
d
concurrently,
c
o
n
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
,
introducing
i
n
t
r
o
d
u
c
i
n
g
additional
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
complexity
c
o
m
p
l
e
x
i
t
y
and
a
n
d
risk:
r
i
s
k
:
SIMOPS
S
I
M
O
P
S
Activity
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
Potential
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
Concurrent
C
o
n
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
Operations
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
Drilling
D
r
i
l
l
i
n
g
&
&
Well
W
e
l
l
Completion
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
Installation
I
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
or
o
r
commissioning
c
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
i
n
g
of
o
f
new
n
e
w
facilities
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Ongoing
O
n
g
o
i
n
g
Production
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
Operation
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
of
o
f
nearby
n
e
a
r
b
y
production
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
units
u
n
i
t
s
handed
h
a
n
d
e
d
over
o
v
e
r
earlier
e
a
r
l
i
e
r
Risk
R
i
s
k
assessments
a
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
s
shall
s
h
a
l
l
be
b
e
carried
c
a
r
r
i
e
d
out
o
u
t
to
t
o
evaluate
e
v
a
l
u
a
t
e
interactions
i
n
t
e
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
s
between
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
simultaneous
s
i
m
u
l
t
a
n
e
o
u
s
activities
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
and
a
n
d
define
d
e
fi
n
e
mitigation
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
measures.
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
.
CONOPS
C
O
N
O
P
S
For
F
o
r
the
t
h
e
Floating
F
l
o
a
t
i
n
g
Production
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
Unit
U
n
i
t
(FPU),
(
F
P
U
)
,
it
i
t
is
i
s
assumed
a
s
s
u
m
e
d
that
t
h
a
t
certain
c
e
r
t
a
i
n
activities
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
under
u
n
d
e
r
the
t
h
e
Engineering,
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
,
Procurement,
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
m
e
n
t
,
Construction,
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
,
and
a
n
d
Installation
I
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
(EPCI)
(
E
P
C
I
)
scope
s
c
o
p
e
may
m
a
y
occur
o
c
c
u
r
concurrently
c
o
n
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
with
w
i
t
h
production
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
operations.
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
Further
F
u
r
t
h
e
r
studies
s
t
u
d
i
e
s
will
w
i
l
l
determine:
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
:
-
Criticality
C
r
i
t
i
c
a
l
i
t
y
of
o
f
simultaneous
s
i
m
u
l
t
a
n
e
o
u
s
execution.
e
x
e
c
u
t
i
o
n
.
-
Benefits
B
e
n
e
fi
t
s
and
a
n
d
risks
r
i
s
k
s
of
o
f
maintaining
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
concurrent
c
o
n
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
operations.
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
-
Alternative
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
strategies
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
e
s
if
i
f
concurrent
c
o
n
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
execution
e
x
e
c
u
t
i
o
n
is
i
s
deemed
d
e
e
m
e
d
unsuitable.
u
n
s
u
i
t
a
b
l
e
.
0.00